Abstract
A number of methodologies and techniques have been proposed to integrate safety and security in risk assessment, but there is an ideological divide between component-centric and systems-theoretic approaches. In this paper, we propose a new hybrid method for Systems-Theoretic Likelihood and Severity Analysis (STLSA), which combines desirable characteristics from both schools of thought. Specifically, STLSA focuses on functional control actions in the system, including humans-in-the-loop, but incorporates semi-quantitative risk assessment based on existing industry practice. We demonstrate this new approach using the case study of train braking control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IEC 60812: Analysis techniques for system reliability ? procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)
First mrt accident (2004). http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_814_2004-12-31.html
BS EN 50126–1. Railway applications-The Specification and Demonstration Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). Part 1: Basic Requirements and Generic Process (2015)
Chockalingam, S., Hadziosmanovic, D., Pieters, W., Teixeira, A., van Gelder, P.: Integrated safety and security risk assessment methods: a survey of key characteristics and applications. In: CRITIS (2016)
Defence Science and Technology Agency blog. How we caught the circle line rogue train with data (2016). https://blog.data.gov.sg/how-we-caught-the-circle-linerogue-train-with-data-79405c86ab6a#.4fu3jqint
Fovino, I.N., Masera, M., De Cian, A.: Integrating cyber attacks within fault trees. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(9), 1394–1402 (2009)
Friedberg, I., McLaughlin, K., Smith, P., Laverty, D., Sezer, S.: STPA-SafeSec: safety and security analysis for cyber-physical systems. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 34, 183–196 (2016)
Henniger, O., Apvrille, L., Fuchs, A., Roudier, Y., Ruddle, A., Weyl, B.: Security requirements for automotive on-board networks. In: 2009 9th International Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems Telecommunications, (ITST), pp. 641–646. IEEE (2009)
Kriaa, S., Pietre-Cambacedes, L., Bouissou, M., Halgand, Y.: A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 139, 156–178 (2015)
Macher, G., Höller, A., Sporer, H., Armengaud, E., Kreiner, C.: A combined safety-hazards and security-threat analysis method for automotive systems. In: Koornneef, F., Gulijk, C. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9338, pp. 237–250. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24249-1_21
Massacci, F., Paci, F.: How to select a security requirements method? a comparative study with students and practitioners. In: Jøsang, A., Carlsson, B. (eds.) NordSec 2012. LNCS, vol. 7617, pp. 89–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34210-3_7
Piètre-Cambacédès, L., Bouissou, M.: Cross-fertilization between safety and security engineering. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 110, 110–126 (2013)
Raspotnig, C., Karpati, P., Katta, V.: A combined process for elicitation and analysis of safety and security requirements. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 347–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_24
Raspotnig, C., Karpati, P., Katta, V.: A combined process for elicitation and analysis of safety and security requirements. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD - 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 347–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_24
Schmittner, C., Gruber, T., Puschner, P., Schoitsch, E.: Security application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). In: Bondavalli, A., Di Giandomenico, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8666, pp. 310–325. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10506-2_21
Schmittner, C., Ma, Z., Puschner, P.: Limitation and improvement of STPA-sec for safety and security co-analysis. In: Skavhaug, A., Guiochet, J., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9923, pp. 195–209. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45480-1_16
Schmittner, C., Ma, Z., Schoitsch, E., Gruber, T.: A case study of fmvea and chassis as safety and security co-analysis method for automotive cyber-physical systems. In: ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical System Security, pp. 69–80. ACM (2015)
Schmittner, C., Ma, Z., Smith, P.: FMVEA for safety and security analysis of intelligent and cooperative vehicles. In: Bondavalli, A., Ceccarelli, A., Ortmeier, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8696, pp. 282–288. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10557-4_31
Shostack, A., Lambert, S., Ostwald, T., Hernan, S.: Uncover security design flaws using the STRIDE approach. MSDN Mag., November 2006. https://msdn.microsoft.com/magazine/msdn-magazine-issues
Temple, W.G., Wu, Y., Chen, B., Kalbarczyk, Z.: Reconciling systems-theoretic and component-centric methods for safety and security co-analysis. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10489, pp. 87–93. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_9
The Straits Times. Oil spillage led to mrt train collision, Panel (1993). http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19931020-1.2.2
The Straits Times. Train’s faulty signals behind circle line woes (2016). http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/trains-faulty-signals-behindcircle-line-woes
Young, W., Leveson, N.: Systems thinking for safety and security. In: ACSAC, pp. 1–8. ACM (2013)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its National Cybersecurity R&D Programme (Award No. NRF2014NCR-NCR001-31) and administered by the National Cybersecurity R&D Directorate. It was also supported in part by the research grant for the Human-Centered Cyber-physical Systems Programme at the Advanced Digital Sciences Center from Singapore’s Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Temple, W.G., Wu, Y., Chen, B., Kalbarczyk, Z. (2017). Systems-Theoretic Likelihood and Severity Analysis for Safety and Security Co-engineering. In: Fantechi, A., Lecomte, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds) Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems. Modelling, Analysis, Verification, and Certification. RSSRail 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10598. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68499-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68499-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68498-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68499-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)