Abstract
The present study examines the psychometric properties and the usefulness of the Health Information Literacy Knowledge Test (HILK), a 24 item multiple-choice test which aims at assessing knowledge related to determining a health information need, searching and accessing information, and evaluating its relevance and quality. 144 German university students completed the HILK together with established subjective measures of health (information) literacy and health status. Correlations of the HILK with subjective measures were at least marginally significant, supporting the assumption that both types of measures assess related constructs. In multiple regression analyses, HILK scores predicted mental and physical health status while there were no associations between subjective health (information) literacy with both health measures. It is concluded that the HILK is a research tool which complements subjective assessments of health literacy and might even be more useful when it comes to predicting health outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In this paper, I will use the terms “subjective” versus “objective” measures as synonyms to “perception-based” versus “performance-based” measures [7].
- 2.
The tool was translated into German independently by two researchers (the author and a PhD student), and discrepancies were resolved by discussion. An English native speaker then back-translated the test which lead to minor refinements of wording.
- 3.
Because all predictors were intercorrelated, the results were checked for evidence of multicollinearity which might bias the coefficients. All variance inflation factors were < 1.77 and all tolerances were > 0.56. These values are well below the values of VIF = 10 and tolerance < 0.2 which are usually assumed to indicate that collinearity might constitute a problem [27].
References
Medical Library Association Task Force on Health Information: Health Information Literacy Definitions (2003)
Niemelä, R., Ek, S., Eriksson-Backa, K., Huotari, M.-L.: A screening tool for assessing everyday health information literacy. Libri 62(2), 125–134 (2012)
Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., Brand, H.: Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and ıntegration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 12(1), 80 (2012)
American Library Association: Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report (1989)
Berkman, N.D., Sheridan, S.L., Donahue, K.E., Halpern, D.J., Crotty, K.: Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(2), 97–107 (2011)
Ivanitskaya, L.V., Hanisko, K.A., Garrison, J.A., Janson, S.J., Vibbert, D.: Developing health information literacy: a needs analysis from the perspective of preprofessional health students. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 100(4), 277–283 (2012)
Schulz, P.J., Hartung, U.: The future of health literacy. In: Schaeffer, D., Pelikan, J.M. (eds.) Health Literacy. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven [Health Literacy. State of Research and Perspectives], pp. 79–92. Hogrefe, Goettingen (2017)
Altin, S.V., Finke, I., Kautz-Freimuth, S., Stock, S.: The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 14, 1207 (2014)
Haun, J.N., Valerio, M.A., McCormack, L.A., Sørensen, K., Paasche-Orlow, M.K.: Health literacy measurement: an inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments. J. Health Commun. 19(Suppl. 2), 302–333 (2014)
Brackett, M.A., Mayer, J.D.: Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29(9), 1147–1158 (2003)
Freund, P.A., Kasten, N.: How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability. Psychol. Bull. 138(2), 296–321 (2012)
Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(6), 1121–1134 (1999)
Parker, R.M., Baker, D.W., Williams, M.V., Nurss, J.R.: The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. J. Gen. Intern.Med. 10(10), 537–541 (1995)
Davis, T.C., Long, S.W., Jackson, R.H., Mayeaux, E.J., George, R.B., Murphy, P.W., Crouch, M.A.: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam. Med. 25(6), 391–395 (1993)
Weiss, B.D., Mays, M.Z., Martz, W., Castro, K.M., DeWalt, D.A., Pignone, M.P., Hale, F.A.: Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann. Fam. Med. 3(6), 514–522 (2005)
Nutbeam, D.: Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot. Int. 15(3), 259–267 (2000)
Ivanitskaya, L., Boyle, I.O., Casey, A.M.: Health information literacy and competencies of information age students: results from the interactive online research readiness self-assessment (RRSA). J. Med. Internet Res. 8(2), e6 (2006)
Steckelberg, A., Huelfenhaus, C., Kasper, J., Rost, J., Mühlhauser, I.: How to measure critical health competences: development and validation of the critical health competence test (CHC test). Adv. Health Sci. Educ.: Theory Pract. 14(1), 11–22 (2009)
Eisenberg, M.B., Berkowitz, R.E.: Information Problem Solving: the Big Six Skills Approach to Library, Information Skills Instruction. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1990)
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., Walraven, A.: A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Comput. Educ. 53(4), 1207–1217 (2009)
Chan, Y.M.: Predictors of health information overload within internet users. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Res. 2(12), 881–887 (2012)
Norman, C.D., Skinner, H.A.: eHEALS: the ehealth literacy scale. J. Med. Internet Res. 8(4), e27 (2006)
Soellner, R., Huber, S., Reder, M.: The concept of ehealth literacy and its measurement. J. Media Psychol. 26, 29–38 (2014)
Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Pelikan, J.M., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Slonska, Z., Brand, H.: Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the european health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health 13(1), 948 (2013)
Bullinger, M., Kirchberger, I.: Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand – Manual [Health Survey – Manual]. Hogrefe, Goettingen (1998)
McNeish, D.: Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We’ll Take it From Here. Psychological Methods (accepted for publication) (2017)
Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th edn. Sage, London (2013)
Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Combining self-assessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: empirical results and recommendations for practice. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 39, 1–15 (2015)
Van der Heide, I., Uiters, E., Boshuizen, H., Rademakers, J.: Health literacy in Europe: the development and validation of health literacy prediction models. Eur. J. Public Health 25 (suppl_3) (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mayer, AK. (2018). Subjective and Objective Measures of Health Information Literacy: Do They Provide Complementary or Redundant Information?. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds) Information Literacy in the Workplace. ECIL 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 810. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74333-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74334-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)