Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Concept Embedding for Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10772))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Concepts are used to solve the term-mismatch problem. However, we need an effective similarity measure between concepts. Word embedding presents a promising solution. We present in this study three approaches to build concepts vectors based on words vectors. We use a vector-based measure to estimate inter-concepts similarity. Our experiments show promising results. Furthermore, words and concepts become comparable. This could be used to improve conceptual indexing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Concepts have many definitions [1]. A concept here refers to a category ID that encompasses synonymous words and phrases, e.g. UMLS concepts, WordNet synsets.

  2. 2.

    wordnet.princeton.edu.

  3. 3.

    www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/.

  4. 4.

    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/, PubMed collection contains: 1177879 vocabularies.

References

  1. Abdulahhad, K.: Information Retrieval (IR) modeling by logic and lattice. Application to Conceptual IR. Theses. Université de Grenoble, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Choi, Y., Chiu, C.Y.I., Sontag, D.: Learning low-dimensional representations of medical concepts. In: AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings 2016, p. 41 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clinchant, S., Perronnin, F.: Aggregating continuous word embeddings for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, pp. 100–109 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crestani, F.: Exploiting the similarity of non-matching terms at retrievaltime. Inf. Retr. 2, 27–47 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Vine, L., Zuccon, G., Koopman, B., Sitbon, L., Bruza, P.: Medical semantic similarity with a neural language model. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2014, pp. 1819–1822 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diaz, F., Mitra, B., Craswell, N.: Query expansion with locally-trained word embeddings. CoRR abs/1605.07891 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07891

  7. Guo, J., Fan, Y., Ai, Q., Croft, W.B.: Semantic matching by non-linear word transportation for information retrieval. In: the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2016, pp. 701–710 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kenter, T., de Rijke, M.: Short text similarity with word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2015, pp. 1411–1420 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2014, vol. 32, pp. II-1188–II-1196 (2014). JMLR.org

  10. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2013, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pedersen, T., Pakhomov, S.V.S., Patwardhan, S., Chute, C.G.: Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain. J. Biomed. Inform. 40(3), 288–299 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. EMNLP 14, 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zamani, H., Croft, W.B.: Estimating embedding vectors for queries. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval, ICTIR 2016, pp. 123–132 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zuccon, G., Koopman, B., Bruza, P., Azzopardi, L.: Integrating and evaluating neural word embeddings in information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, ADCS 2015, pp. 12:1–12:8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karam Abdulahhad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdulahhad, K. (2018). Concept Embedding for Information Retrieval. In: Pasi, G., Piwowarski, B., Azzopardi, L., Hanbury, A. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10772. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76941-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics