Abstract
Usage of online textual media is steadily increasing. Daily, more and more news stories, blog posts and scientific articles are added to the online volumes. These are all freely accessible and have been employed extensively in multiple research areas, e.g. automatic text summarization, information retrieval, information extraction, etc. Meanwhile, online debate forums have recently become popular, but have remained largely unexplored. For this reason, there are no sufficient resources of annotated debate data available for conducting research in this genre. In this paper, we collected and annotated debate data for an automatic summarization task. Similar to extractive gold standard summary generation our data contains sentences worthy to include into a summary. Five human annotators performed this task. Inter-annotator agreement, based on semantic similarity, is 36% for Cohen’s kappa and 48% for Krippendorff’s alpha. Moreover, we also implement an extractive summarization system for online debates and discuss prominent features for the task of summarizing online debate data automatically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
This dataset can be downloaded at https://goo.gl/3aicDN.
- 3.
References
Morris, A.H., Kasper, G.M., Adams, D.A.: The effects and limitations of automated text condensing on reading comprehension performance. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 17–35 (1992)
Baxendale, P.B.: Machine-made index for technical literature: an experiment. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2(4), 354–361 (1958)
Lin, C.-Y., Hovy, E.: The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2000, vol. 1, pp. 495–501. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2000)
Dunning, T.: Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Comput. Linguist. 19(1), 61–74 (1993)
Edmundson, H.P.: New methods in automatic extracting. J. ACM 16(2), 264–285 (1969)
Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
Liu, F., Liu Y.: Correlation between rouge and human evaluation of extractive meeting summaries. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies: Short Papers, HLT-Short 2008, pp. 201–204. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2008)
Goldstein, J., Kantrowitz, M., Mittal, V., Carbonell, J.: Summarizing text documents: sentence selection and evaluation metrics. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1999, pp. 121–128. ACM, New York (1999)
Landis, R.J., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)
Januliene, A., Dziedraviius, J.: On the use of conjunctive adverbs in learners’ academic essays. Verbum 6, 69–83 (2015)
Neto, J.L., Freitas, A.A., Kaestner, C.A.A.: Automatic text summarization using a machine learning approach. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 205–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36127-8_20
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2004)
Mitrat, M., Singhal, A., Buckleytt, C.: Automatic text summarization by paragraph extraction. In: Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pp. 39–46 (1997)
Manning, C.D., Schtze, H.: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Nenkova, A., McKeown, K.: Automatic summarization. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 5(2), 103–233 (2011)
Řehůřek, R., Sojka, P.: Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, pp. 45–50. ELRA, Valletta (2010). http://is.muni.cz/publication/884893/en
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the UK EPSRC Grant No. EP/I004327/1, the European Union under Grant Agreements No. 611233 PHEME, and the authors would like to thank Bankok University of their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sanchan, N., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K. (2018). Gold Standard Online Debates Summaries and First Experiments Towards Automatic Summarization of Online Debate Data. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77115-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77116-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)