Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Gold Standard Online Debates Summaries and First Experiments Towards Automatic Summarization of Online Debate Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10762))

Abstract

Usage of online textual media is steadily increasing. Daily, more and more news stories, blog posts and scientific articles are added to the online volumes. These are all freely accessible and have been employed extensively in multiple research areas, e.g. automatic text summarization, information retrieval, information extraction, etc. Meanwhile, online debate forums have recently become popular, but have remained largely unexplored. For this reason, there are no sufficient resources of annotated debate data available for conducting research in this genre. In this paper, we collected and annotated debate data for an automatic summarization task. Similar to extractive gold standard summary generation our data contains sentences worthy to include into a summary. Five human annotators performed this task. Inter-annotator agreement, based on semantic similarity, is 36% for Cohen’s kappa and 48% for Krippendorff’s alpha. Moreover, we also implement an extractive summarization system for online debates and discuss prominent features for the task of summarizing online debate data automatically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.debate.org.

  2. 2.

    This dataset can be downloaded at https://goo.gl/3aicDN.

  3. 3.

    http://www.nltk.org/api/nltk.tag.html.

References

  1. Morris, A.H., Kasper, G.M., Adams, D.A.: The effects and limitations of automated text condensing on reading comprehension performance. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 17–35 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baxendale, P.B.: Machine-made index for technical literature: an experiment. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2(4), 354–361 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, C.-Y., Hovy, E.: The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2000, vol. 1, pp. 495–501. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunning, T.: Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Comput. Linguist. 19(1), 61–74 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmundson, H.P.: New methods in automatic extracting. J. ACM 16(2), 264–285 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, F., Liu Y.: Correlation between rouge and human evaluation of extractive meeting summaries. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies: Short Papers, HLT-Short 2008, pp. 201–204. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, J., Kantrowitz, M., Mittal, V., Carbonell, J.: Summarizing text documents: sentence selection and evaluation metrics. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1999, pp. 121–128. ACM, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Landis, R.J., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Januliene, A., Dziedraviius, J.: On the use of conjunctive adverbs in learners’ academic essays. Verbum 6, 69–83 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Neto, J.L., Freitas, A.A., Kaestner, C.A.A.: Automatic text summarization using a machine learning approach. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 205–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36127-8_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitrat, M., Singhal, A., Buckleytt, C.: Automatic text summarization by paragraph extraction. In: Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pp. 39–46 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manning, C.D., Schtze, H.: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nenkova, A., McKeown, K.: Automatic summarization. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 5(2), 103–233 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Řehůřek, R., Sojka, P.: Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, pp. 45–50. ELRA, Valletta (2010). http://is.muni.cz/publication/884893/en

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the UK EPSRC Grant No. EP/I004327/1, the European Union under Grant Agreements No. 611233 PHEME, and the authors would like to thank Bankok University of their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nattapong Sanchan , Ahmet Aker or Kalina Bontcheva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sanchan, N., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K. (2018). Gold Standard Online Debates Summaries and First Experiments Towards Automatic Summarization of Online Debate Data. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77115-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77116-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics