Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Privacy Attitudes and Data Valuation Among Fitness Tracker Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transforming Digital Worlds (iConference 2018)

Abstract

Fitness trackers are an increasingly popular tool for tracking one’s health and physical activity. While research has evaluated the potential benefits of these devices for health and well-being, few studies have empirically evaluated users’ behaviors when sharing personal fitness information (PFI) and the privacy concerns that stem from the collection, aggregation, and sharing of PFI. In this study, we present findings from a survey of Fitbit and Jawbone users (N = 361) to understand how concerns about privacy in general and user-generated data in particular affect users’ mental models of PFI privacy, tracking, and sharing. Findings highlight the complex relationship between users’ demographics, sharing behaviors, privacy concerns, and internet skills with how valuable and sensitive they rate their PFI. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities to increase user awareness of privacy and PFI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acquisti, A., Gross, R.: Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: Danezis, G., Golle, P. (eds.) PET 2006. LNCS, vol. 4258, pp. 36–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11957454_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball, K., Di Domenico, M.L., Nunan, D.: Big data surveillance and the body-subject. Body Soc. 22(2), 58–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15624973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes, S.D.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(5), 662–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd, D., Hargittai, E.: Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday 15(8) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christovich, M.: Why should we care what Fitbit shares: a proposed statutory solution to protect sensitive personal fitness information. Hastings Commun./Entertain. Law J. 38, 91–116 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clawson, J., et al.: No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on Craigslist. In: Proceedings of UbiComp 2015, pp. 647–658. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807554

  8. Crawford, K., Lingel, J., Karppi, T.: Our metrics, ourselves: a hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. Euro. J. Cult. Stud. 18(4–5), 479–496 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Mooy, M., Yuen, S.: Toward privacy aware research and development in wearable health. Center for Democracy and Technology, Washington (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Earp, J.B., Anton, A.I., Aiman-Smith, L., Stufflebeam, W.H.: Examining internet privacy policies within the context of user privacy values. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 52(2), 227–237 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.844927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. European Union: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Off. J. Eur. Union 119, 1–88 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fitbit: Fitbit Privacy Policy (2016). http://www.fitbit.com/legal/privacy-policy

  13. Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Tracking for Health. Pew Research Center, Washington (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fritz, T., Huang, E.M., Murphy, G.C., Zimmermann, T.: Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp. 487–496. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557383

  15. Gorm, N., Shklovski, I.: Sharing steps in the workplace: changing privacy concerns over time. In: Proceedings of CHI 2016, pp. 4315–4319. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858352

  16. Gorm, N., Shklovski, I.: Steps, choices and moral accounting: observations from a step-counting campaign in the workplace. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2016, pp. 148–159. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819944

  17. Hargittai, E., Hsieh, Y.P.: Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30(1), 95–107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310397146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hargittai, E., Marwick, A.: “What can I really do?” Explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy. Int. J. Commun. 10, 3737–3757 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ho, J.-J., Novick, S., Yeung, C.: A snapshot of data sharing by select health and fitness apps. Federal Trade Commission, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jawbone: Jawbone UP Privacy Policy (2014). https://jawbone.com/up/privacy

  21. Klasnja, P., Consolvo, S., Choudhury, T., Beckwith, R., Hightower, J.: Exploring privacy concerns about personal sensing. In: Tokuda, H., Beigl, M., Friday, A., Brush, A.J.B., Tobe, Y. (eds.) Pervasive 2009. LNCS, vol. 5538, pp. 176–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, P.: Privacy policies and their lack of clear disclosure regarding the life cycle of user information. In: FS-16–04, pp. 249–256. AAAI, Palo Alto (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lupton, D.: The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Polity, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McDonald, A.M., Cranor, L.F.: The cost of reading privacy policies. ISJLP 4, 543–568 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Motti, V.G., Caine, K.: Users’ privacy concerns about wearables: impact of form factor, sensors and type of data collected. In: Brenner, M., Christin, N., Johnson, B., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2015. LNCS, vol. 8976, pp. 231–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Patterson, H.: Contextual expectations of privacy in self-generated health information flows. In: TPRC 41, pp. 1–48. SSRN, Rochester (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2242144

  27. Peppet, S.R.: Regulating the internet of things: first steps toward managing discrimination, privacy, security and consent. Tex. Law Rev. 93, 85–178 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raij, A., Ghosh, A., Kumar, S., Srivastava, M.: Privacy risks emerging from the adoption of innocuous wearable sensors in the mobile environment. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978945

  29. Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., Chalmers, M.: Personal tracking as lived informatics. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp. 1163–1172. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039

  30. Shirer, M., Llamas, R., Ubrani, J.: IDC Forecasts Wearables Shipments to Reach 213.6 Million Units Worldwide in 2020. IDC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taddicken, M.: The “privacy paradox” in the social web. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19, 248–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vitak, J.: A digital path to happiness? In: Reinecke, L., Oliver, M.B. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being, pp. 274–287. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu, H., Gupta, S., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Measuring mobile users’ concerns for information privacy. In: Proceedings of ICIS 2012, pp. 1–16. AIS, Atlanta (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Vitak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vitak, J., Liao, Y., Kumar, P., Zimmer, M., Kritikos, K. (2018). Privacy Attitudes and Data Valuation Among Fitness Tracker Users. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds) Transforming Digital Worlds. iConference 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10766. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78104-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78105-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics