Abstract
The virtual learning landscapes have created complex environments when evaluating an educational experience. The Fuzzy Delphi method, which incorporates the theory of fuzzy sets, takes the opinions issued by judges, from a linguistic perspective, to validate a questionnaire that will measure the degree of success of an educational experience. The judges have to reach a consensus on the validity and applicability of the instrument. This work contributes to the validation of questionnaires by enabling linguistic assessments and not only binary answers and with a calculus of consistency and consensus degrees for each item, which contributes to consensus reaching. It has been used as a practical experience to define, with the consensus of nine experts, a questionnaire that measures the virtual communication and the satisfaction with in a Blended-Learning pilot experience in the subject of Software Fundamentals, 1st semester of the Degree in Computer Engineering of the University of Granada.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education, Washington, D.C. (2012)
Berk, R.: Importance of expert judgment in content-related validity evidence. West. J. Nurs. Res. 12(5), 659–671 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599001200507
Carrasco, R.A., et al.: A linguistic multi-criteria decision making model applied to the integration of education questionnaires. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 4(5), 946–959 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2011.9727844
Cornelius, S., Gordon, C.: Providing a flexible, learner-centred programme: challenges for educators. Internet High. Educ. 11(1), 33–41 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.003
Dalkey, N.: An experimental study of group opinion: the delphi method. Futures 1(5), 408–426 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
Dong, J., Huo, H.: Identification of financing barriers to energy efficiency in small and medium-sized enterprises by integrating the fuzzy delphi and fuzzy dematel approaches. Energies 10(8), 1172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081172
GarcÍa-Lira, K., Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Montes-Soldado, R.: Cuestionarios para la evaluacion de la comunicacion y la satisfaccion al aplicar metodologias flipped classroom combinadas con m-learning en educacion superior. In: III Congreso Internacional de Educación Mediática y Competencia Digital, pp. 1145–1163 (2017)
Garrison, D., Akyol, Z.: Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. Internet High. Educ. 17(Suppl. C), 84–89 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
Gupta, R., et al.: Selection of 3PL service provider using integrated fuzzy delphi and fuzzy topsis. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 2, pp. 20–22 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.048862
Ishikawa, A., et al.: The max-min delphi method and fuzzy delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 55(3), 241–253 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C
Jaldemark, J., et al.: Editorial introduction: collaborative learning enhanced by mobile technologies. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49, 201–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12596
Kim, J.: Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42(5), 763–777 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x
Lage, M.J., et al.: Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J. Econ. Educ. 31(1), 30–43 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
Lensing, S.Y., et al.: Encouraging physicians to respond to surveys through the use of fax technology. Eval. Health Prof. 23(3), 348–359 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/01632780022034642
Lin, C.: Application of fuzzy delphi method (FDM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation. Int. J. Clothing Sci. Technol. 25(3), 171–183 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/09556221311300192
Lynn, M.R.: Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 35(6), 382–386 (1986)
Noorderhaven, N.G.: Strategic Decision Making. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham (1995)
Tucker, B.: The flipped classroom. Educ. Next 12(1) (2012)
Valtonen, T., et al.: Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students. Comput. Educ. 58(2), 732–739 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.025
Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Acknowledgments
This document has been funded by the research project TIN2017-89517-P of the Ministry of Science and Innovation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morales, J., Montes, R., Zermeño, N., Duran, J., Herrera, F. (2018). The Use of Fuzzy Linguistic Information and Fuzzy Delphi Method to Validate by Consensus a Questionnaire in a Blended-Learning Environment. In: Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Verdegay, J., Perfilieva, I., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Applications. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91479-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91479-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91478-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91479-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)