Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Framework for Group Decision-Making: Including Cognitive and Affective Aspects in a MCDA Method for Alternatives Rejection

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 15th International Conference (DCAI2018 2018)

Abstract

With the evolution of the organizations and technology, Group Decision Support Systems have changed to support decision-makers that cannot be together at the same place and time to make a decision. However, these systems must now be able to support the interaction between decision-makers and provide all the relevant information at the most adequate times. Failing to do so may compromise the success and the acceptance of the system. In this work it is proposed a framework for group decision using a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis method capable of identify inconsistent assessments done by the decision-maker and identify alternatives that should be rejected by the group of decision-makers. The proposed framework allows to present more relevant information throughout the decision-making process and this way guide decision-makers in the achievement of more consensual and satisfactory decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lunenburg, F.C.: Decision making in organizations. Int. J. Manage. Bus. Adm. 15, 1–9 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson, D.C.: Decision-making in organizations. In: Managing Organizations: Current Issues, vol. 43 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luthans, F.: Organizational Behavior, vol. 46, p. 594. McGraw-Hill, Irwin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis, A.R.: Information exchange and use in group decision making: you can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Q. 20, 433–457 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lunenburg, F.C.: Group decision making. Nat. Forum Teach. Educ. J. 20(3), 1–7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Proctor, T.: Creative Problem Solving: Developing Skills for Decision Making and Innovation. Routledge, New York, NY (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunnarsson, M.: Group Decision Making. Verlag, Frederick (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huber, G.P.: Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Q. Manage. Inf. Syst. 8, 195–204 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon, O., Yoo, K., Suh, E.: UbiDSS: a proactive intelligent decision support system as an expert system deploying ubiquitous computing technologies. Expert Syst. Appl. 28, 149–161 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morente-Molinera, J.A., Wikström, R., Herrera-Viedma, E., Carlsson, C.: A linguistic mobile decision support system based on fuzzy ontology to facilitate knowledge mobilization. Decis. Support Syst. 81, 66–75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jay F Nunamaker, J.R.: Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 47, 357–385 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shim, J.P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J.F., Power, D.J., Sharda, R., Carlsson, C.: Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decis. Support Syst. 33, 111–126 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carneiro, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P.: Intelligent negotiation model for ubiquitous group decision scenarios. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 17, 296–308 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez-Anguix, V., Julian, V., Botti, V., García-Fornes, A.: Tasks for agent-based negotiation teams: analysis, review, and challenges. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26, 2480–2494 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sánchez-Anguix, V., Botti, V., Julián, V., García-Fornes, A.: Analyzing intra-team strategies for agent-based negotiation teams. In: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 3, pp. 929–936 (2011). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carneiro, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Jimenez, A., Novais, P.: Dynamic argumentation in UbiGDSS. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 55(3), 633–669 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greco, S., Figueira, J., Ehrgott, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dehe, B., Bamford, D.: Development, test and comparison of two multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models: a case of healthcare infrastructure location. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 6717–6727 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ram, C., Montibeller, G., Morton, A.: Extending the use of scenario planning and MCDA for the evaluation of strategic options. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62, 817–829 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golmohammadi, D., Mellat-Parast, M.: Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 137, 191–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carneiro, J., Conceição, L., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P.: Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 265(2), 269–291 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Carneiro, J., Saraiva, P., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P.: Representing decision-makers using styles of behavior: an approach designed for group decision support systems. In: Cognitive Systems Research (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carneiro, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P.: Including credibility and expertise in group decision-making process: an approach designed for UbiGDSS. In: World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 416–425. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIS Project (ANI|P2020 21958) and has received funding from FEDER Funds through P2020 program and from National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) under the projects UID/EEA/00760/2013 and UID/CEC/00319/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Carneiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carneiro, J., Conceição, L., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Novais, P. (2019). A Framework for Group Decision-Making: Including Cognitive and Affective Aspects in a MCDA Method for Alternatives Rejection. In: De La Prieta, F., Omatu, S., Fernández-Caballero, A. (eds) Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 15th International Conference. DCAI2018 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 800. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94649-8_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics