Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Reuse Within Safety-Oriented Process Lines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 896))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, Safety-oriented Process Line Engineering (SoPLE) has been proposed as a sound solution to systematize reuse in the context of safety-oriented processes described within safety-related standards. Currently, however, no metrics have been used to measure the actual gain in terms of reuse that the application of this engineering method entails. To overcome this lack of quantitative evidence, we adopt the GQM\(^{+}\) Strategies model, an extension of the Goal/Question/Metric (GQM) paradigm, for measurements. After having defined our specific measurement goals, we build on top of existing metrics, defined for measuring product-related reuse, and we translate them in our semantic space to evaluate our goals. We then apply our GQM\(^{+}\) Strategies model on a ECSS-compliant SoPL to illustrate and assess its usefulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BVR Tool. http://modelbased.net/tools/bvr-tool/. Accessed 9 July 2018

  2. Eclipse Process Framework Project. http://www.eclipse.org/epf/. Accessed 9 July 2018

  3. ECSS, ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering-Software. http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/2R690/doc/ECSS-E-ST-40C(6March2009).pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018

  4. ECSS, ECSS-M-ST-10C: Space project management - Project planning and implementation. http://everyspec.com/ESA/download.php?spec=ECSS-M-ST-10C.048180.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018

  5. AMASS. Deliverable D1.1: Case Studies Description and Business Impact (2017). Accessed 9 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  6. AMASS. Deliverable D1.3: Evaluation framework and quality metrics (2017). Accessed 9 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  7. AMASS: Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems. http://www.amass-ecsel.eu. Accessed 9 July 2018

  8. AMASS Consortium: Objectives. AMASS. http://www.amass-ecsel.eu/content/objectives. Accessed 9 July 2018

  9. Basili, V., et al.: GQM+strategies in a nutshell. Aligning Organizations Through Measurement. TFISSSE, pp. 9–17. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05047-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The goal question metric approach, 1994. Citado 3, 11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, M., Laue, R.: A comparative survey of business process similarity measures. Comput. Ind. 63(2), 148–167 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, C., Rendel, H., Rumpe, B.: Measuring the ability to form a product line from existing products. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.6583 (2014)

  13. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36, 498–516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallina, B., Kashiyarandi, S., Martin, H., Bramberger, R.: Modeling a safety-and automotive-oriented process line to enable reuse and flexible process derivation. In: IEEE 38th International Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), pp. 504–509 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gallina, B., Kashiyarandi, S., Zugsbratl, K., Geven, A.: Enabling cross-domain reuse of tool qualification certification artefacts. In: Bondavalli, A., Ceccarelli, A., Ortmeier, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8696, pp. 255–266. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10557-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallina, B., Nyberg, M.: Reconciling the ISO 26262-compliant and the agile documentation management in the swedish context. In: Critical Automotive applications: Robustness and Safety (CARS), Matthieu Roy. HAL, Paris, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gallina, B., Sljivo, I., Jaradat, O.: Towards a safety-oriented process line for enabling reuse in safety critical systems development and certification. In: 35th Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW), pp. 148–157 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Her, J.S., Kim, J.H., Oh, S.H., Rhew, S.Y., Kim, S.D.: A framework for evaluating reusability of core asset in product line engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(7), 740–760 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Javed, M.A., Gallina, B.: Safety-oriented process line engineering via seamless integration between EPF composer and BVR tool. In: 22nd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), 10–14 September, Gothenburg, Sweden. ACM Digital Library (2018, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, M., Gomez, E., Mantineo, A., Mortensen, U.K.: Introducing ECSS software-engineering standards within ESA, August 2002. http://www.esa.int/esapub/bulletin/bullet111/chapter21_bul111.pdf

  21. Korsaa, M., et al.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 25(5), 525–540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Korsaa, M., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 25(4), 381–391 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Messnarz, R., et al.: Social responsibility aspects supporting the success of SPI. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 26(3), 284–294 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (eds.) MANIFESTO Software Process Improvement eurospi.net, Alcala, Spain (2010). http://www.iscn.com/Images/SPI_Manifesto_A.1.2.2010.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018

  25. Varkoi, T., Mäkinen, T., Gallina, B., Cameron, F., Nevalainen, R.: Towards systematic compliance evaluation using safety-oriented process lines and evidence mapping. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 83–95. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by EU and VINNOVA via the ECSEL JU under grant agreement No 692474, AMASS project [7].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Gallina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gallina, B., Iyer, S. (2018). Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Reuse Within Safety-Oriented Process Lines. In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 896. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97924-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97925-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics