Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Pragmatics-First Approach to the Analysis and Generation of Dialogues

  • Conference paper
KI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3238))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1190 Accesses

Abstract

Integration of new utterances into context is a central task in any model for rational (human-machine) dialogues in natural language. In this paper, a pragmatics-first approach to specifying the meaning of utterances in terms of plans is presented. These plans are computed during a dialogue on the basis of information about the current situation that is updated continually. New contributions are integrated into a dialogue if they help in establishing a new plan, or if they deliver important information for executing an already established plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grosz, B.J., Hunsberger, L., Kraus, S.: Planning and acting together. AI Magazine 20, 23–34 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carletta, J.: Risk-Taking and Recovery in Task-Oriented Dialogue. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heeman, P.A., Allen, J.: The trains 93 dialogues. Technical report, Computer Science Dept., University of Rochester, Trains Technical Note 94-2 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer, S., Kießling, W., Holland, S., Fleder, M.: The cosima prototype for multiobjective bargaining. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy, pp. 1364–1371 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In: Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.) The Description Logic Handbook – Theory, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 41–95. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pease, A., Niles, I.: Ieee standard upper ontology: A progress report. Knowledge Engineering Review 17, 65–70 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bücher, K., Knorr, M., Ludwig, B.: Anything to clarify? report your parsing ambiguities? In: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 465–469 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: The ff planning system: Fast plan generation through heuristic search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 253–302 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Carolis, B.D., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I.: Verbal and non verbal discourse planning (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cassell, J., Stone, M., Yan, H.: Coordination and context-dependence in the generation of embodied conversation (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grosz, B.J., Sidner, C.L.: Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Asher, N., Gillies, A.: Common ground, corrections and coordination. Argumentation 17, 481–512 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu-Carroll, J., Carberry, S.: Conflict detection and resolution in collaborative planning. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ECAI-WS 1996 and ATAL 1996. LNCS, vol. 1193, pp. 111–126. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Communicative actions for artificial agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, San Francisco, CA, pp. 65–72 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Allwood, J.: An activity based approach to pragmatics. In: Bunt, H.C., Black, B. (eds.) Abduction, Belief, and Context in Dialogue. Studies in Computational Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson, S.: Issue-based Dialogue Management. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Allen, J.F., Byron, D., Dzikovska, M., Ferguson, G., Galescu, L., Stent, A.: Towards conversational human-computer interaction. AI Magazine (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bos, J., Oka, T.: An inference-based approach to dialogue system design. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 113–119 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ludwig, B. (2004). A Pragmatics-First Approach to the Analysis and Generation of Dialogues. In: Biundo, S., Frühwirth, T., Palm, G. (eds) KI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3238. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30221-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30221-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23166-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30221-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics