Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Comparing Weighting Models for Monolingual Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
Comparative Evaluation of Multilingual Information Access Systems (CLEF 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3237))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Motivated by the hypothesis that the retrieval performance of a weighting model is independent of the language in which queries and collection are expressed, we compared the retrieval performance of three weighting models, i.e., Okapi, statistical language modeling (SLM), and deviation from randomness (DFR), on three monolingual test collections, i.e., French, Italian, and Spanish. The DFR model was found to consistently achieve better results than both Okapi and SLM, whose performance was comparable. We also evaluated whether the use of retrieval feedback improved retrieval performance; retrieval feedback was beneficial for DFR and Okapi and detrimental for SLM. Besides relative performance, DFR with retrieval feedback achieved excellent absolute results: best run for Italian and Spanish, third run for French.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: FUB at TREC-10 Web Track: A Probabilistic Framework for Topic Relevance Term Weighting. In: Proceedings of the 10th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-10), pp. 182–191. NIST Special Publication 500-250, Gaithersburg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Italian monolingual information retrieval with PROSIT. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J. (eds.) CLEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2785, pp. 257–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Amati, G., van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring divergence from randomness. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 20(4), 357–389 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Fondazione Ugo Bordoni at TREC 2003: Robust and Web track. In: Proceedings of TREC 2003, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, pp. 210–219 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpineto, C., De Mori, R., Romano, G., Bigi, B.: An Information Theoretic Approach to Automatic Query Expansion. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 19(1), 1–27 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hiemstra, D., Kraaij, W.: Twenty-one at TREC-7: Ad hoc and cross-language track. In: Proceedings of the 7th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7), pp. 227–238. NIST Special Publication 500-242, Gaithersburg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ponte, J., Croft, W.B.: A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Reasearch and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 275–281 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14, 130–137 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Beaulieu, M.M.: Okapi at TREC-7: Automatic Ad Hoc, Filtering, VLC, and Interactive track. In: Proceedings of the 7th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7), pp. 253–264. NIST Special Publication 500-242, Gaithersburg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Savoy, J.: Reports on CLEF-2001 experiments. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J., Kluck, M. (eds.) CLEF 2001. LNCS, vol. 2406, pp. 257–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 334–342 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G. (2004). Comparing Weighting Models for Monolingual Information Retrieval. In: Peters, C., Gonzalo, J., Braschler, M., Kluck, M. (eds) Comparative Evaluation of Multilingual Information Access Systems. CLEF 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3237. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30222-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30222-3_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24017-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30222-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics