Abstract
Chameleon signatures were introduced by Krawczyk and Rabin, being non-interactive signature schemes that provide non-transferability. However, that first construction employs a chameleon hash that suffers from a key exposure problem: The non-transferability property requires willingness of the recipient in consequentially exposing a secret key, and therefore invalidating all signatures issued to the same recipient’s public key. To address this key-revocation issue, and its attending problems of key redistribution, storage of state information, and greater need for interaction, an identity-based scheme was proposed in [1], while a fully key-exposure free construction, based on the elliptic curves with pairings, appeared later in [7].
Herein we provide several constructions of exposure-free chameleon hash functions based on different cryptographic assumptions, such as the RSA and the discrete logarithm assumptions. One of the schemes is a novel construction that relies on a single trapdoor and therefore may potentially be realized over a large set of cryptographic groups (where the discrete logarithm is hard).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ateniese, G., de Medeiros, B.: Identity-based chameleon hash and applications. In: Juels, A. (ed.) FC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3110, pp. 164–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2004), Available online at http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/167/
Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: PSS: Provably secure encoding method for digital signature. IEEE P1363a: Provably secure signatures (1998), http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/p1363a/pssigs.html
Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Short Signatures Without Random Oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 56–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Brassard, G., Chaum, D., Crepeau, C.: Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge. Journal of Computer an Systems Sciences 37(2), 156–189 (1988)
Catalano, D., Gennaro, R., Howgrave-Graham, N., Nguyen, P.Q.: Paillier’s Cryptosystem Revisited. In: ACM CCS (2001)
Chaum, D., Antwerpen, H.: Undeniable signatures. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 212–216. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)
Chen, X., Zhang, F., Kim, K.: Chameleon hashing without key exposure. In: Zhang, K., Zheng, Y. (eds.) ISC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3225, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2004), Available online at, http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/038/
Damgård, I.: Practical and provable secure release of a secret and exchange of signature. Journal of Cryptology 8, 201–222 (1995)
Even, S., Goldreich, O., Micali, S.: On-line/off-line Digital Signatures. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 263–277. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)
Fischlin, M.: Trapdoor commitment schemes and their applications. Ph.D. thesis (2001)
Gennaro, R.: Multi-trapdoor commitments and their applications to proofs of knowledge secure under concurrent man-in-the-middle attacks. In: Franklin, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152, pp. 220–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Chameleon signatures. In: Proceedings of NDSS 2000, pp. 143–154 (2000)
MacKenzie, P., Yang, K.: On Simulation-Sound Trapdoor Commitments. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 382–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Naccache, D., Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Twin signatures: an alternative to the hash-and-sign paradigm. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communication Security (ACM CCS), pp. 20–27. ACM Press, New York (2001)
Okamoto, T.: Provably secure and practical identification schemes and corresponding signature schemes. In: Brickell, E.F. (ed.) CRYPTO 1992. LNCS, vol. 740, pp. 31–53. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Paillier, P.: Public key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Pedersen, T.: Non-interactive and information-theoretic secure verifiable secret sharing. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 129–149. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
RSA Labs: RSA Crypt. Std: EMSAPSS – PKCS#1 v2.1., pp. 26–28, 32–37 (2002)
RSA Labs: RSA Crypt. Std: EMSAPKCS1-v1_5 - PKCS#1 v2.1. pp. 29–33, 37–38 (2002)
Shamir, A., Kalai, Y.: Improved Online/Offline Signature Schemes. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 355–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ateniese, G., de Medeiros, B. (2005). On the Key Exposure Problem in Chameleon Hashes. In: Blundo, C., Cimato, S. (eds) Security in Communication Networks. SCN 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3352. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30598-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30598-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24301-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30598-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)