Abstract
The ability to determine a sequence of actions in order to reach a particular goal is of utmost importance to mobile robots. One major problem with symbolic planning approaches regards assumptions made by the designer while introducing externally specified world models, preconditions and postconditions. To bypass this problem, it would be desirable to develop mechanisms for action planning that are based on the agent’s perceptual and behavioural space, rather than on externally supplied symbolic representations. We present a subsymbolic planning mechanism that uses a non-symbolic representation of sensor-action space, learned through the agent’s autonomous interaction with the environment.
In this paper, we present experiments with two autonomous mobile robots, which use autonomously learned subsymbolic representations of perceptual and behavioural space to determine goal-achieving sequences of actions. The experimental results we present illustrate that such an approach results in an embodied robot planner that produces plans which are grounded in the robot’s perception-action space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.: Strips: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208 (1971)
Nilsson, N.J.: Shakey the robot. Technical Report 323, SRI International (1984)
Harnad, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)
Arkin, R.: Behavior-Based Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Malcolm, C.: Behavioural modules in robotic assembly. Lecture Notes, Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh (2000)
Gat, E.: Integrating planning and reacting in a heterogeneous asynchronous architecture for controlling real-world mobile robots. In: Proceedings AAAI 1992, vol. 4, pp. 809–815 (1992)
Baldassarre, G.: A planning modular neural-network robot for asynchronous multi-goal navigation tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Fourth European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots - EUROBOT-2001, pp. 223–230 (2001)
Baldassarre, G.: Planning with neural networks and reinforcement learning. PhD thesis, University of Essex (2001)
Turing, A.: The chemical basis for morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 37, 129–152 (1952)
Steels, L.: Steps towards common sense. In: Proceedings ECAI 1988, pp. 49–54 (1988)
Fleuret, F., Brunet, E.: DEA: An architecture for goal planning and classification. Neural Computation 12, 1987–2008 (2000)
Fomin, T., Rozgonyi, T., Szepesvári, C., Lörincz, A.: Self-organizing multi-resolution grid for motion planning and control. International Journal of Neural Sciences 7, 757–776 (1996)
Zeller, M., Sharma, R., Schulten, K.: Topology representing network for sensor-based robot motion planning. In: Proceedings of the 1996 World Congress on Neural Networks, pp. 100–103. INNS Press (1996)
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M. (eds.): Essentials of neural science and behavior. Appleton and Lange, Stanford (1995)
Kohonen, T.: Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)
Sun, R.: Symbol grounding: A new look at an old idea. Philosophical Psychology 13, 149–172 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pisokas, J., Nehmzow, U. (2005). Experiments in Subsymbolic Action Planning with Mobile Robots. In: Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D., Alonso, E. (eds) Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems II. AAMAS AAMAS 2004 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32274-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32274-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25260-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32274-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)