Abstract
As a general and challenging task of decisional process in distributed environments, the individual nodes of the network need to exchange specific knowledge in order to achieve their goal. This is the case in distributed instrumentation where a network of intelligent components interact each other to realize some task. A conceptualization of functional knowledge is proposed and we argue that this conceptualization will be represented by ontologies based on mereology and topology. A synthesis of many works in knowledge engineering leads us to propose a knowledge representation with a dual objective. First, it provides instruments designers with a structural and logical framework that allows for easy reuse and secondly, it enable a distributed behavior based on causal representation and on dependencies between functional and behavioral knowledge on each node.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouras, A., Staroswiecki, M.: How can Intelligent Instruments Interoperate in an Application Framework? A Mechanism for Taking into Account Operating Constraints. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. SICICA 1997, Annecy, France, June 9–11 (1997)
Tailland, J., Foulloy, L., Benoit, E.: Automatic Generation of Intelligent Instruments from Internal Model. In: Proc. of 4th IFAC Int.Symp. SICICA 2000, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp. 337–342 (September 2000)
Riviere, J.M., Bayart, M., Thiriet, J.M., Bouras, A., Robert, M.: Intelligent instruments: some modelling approaches. Measurement and Control 29, 179–186 (1996)
Hawkins, R., McDowell, J.K., Sticklen, J., Hill, T., Boyer, R.: Function-based modeling and troubleshooting. Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 8, 285–302 (1994)
Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., Yoshikawa, H.: A design methodology for a self-maintenance machine based on functional redundancy. In: Taylor, D.L., Stauffer, L.A. (eds.) Design Theory and Methodology - DTM 1992. ASME (1992)
Kitamura, Y., Mizoguchi, R.: Functional Ontology for Functional Understanding. In: 12th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Cape Cod, USA, pp. 77–87. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1998)
Lind, M.: Modeling Goals and Functions of Complex Industrial Plant. Journal ofApplied Artificial Intelligence (8), 259–283 (1994)
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R.: Function in device Representation. Journal of Engineering with Computers, Special Issue on Computer aided Engineering 16, 162–177 (2000)
Salustri, F.A.: Function Modeling for an Integrated Framework: A progress Report. In: Cook, D. (ed.) Procs. of FLAIRS 1998, pp. 339–343. AAAI, Menlo Park (1998)
Umeda, Y., et al.: Supporting conceptualdesign based on thefunction-behavior-state modeler. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 275–288 (1996)
Qian, L., Gero, I.: Function-behavior-structure paths andtheir role in analogy-based design. ArtificialIntelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis andManufacturing 10(4), 289–292 (1996)
Kitamura, Y., Sano, T., Namba, K., Mizogushi, R.: A Functional Concept Ontology and its Application to Automatic Identification of Functional Structures. Advanced Engineering Informatics 16(2), 145–163 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dapoigny, R., Benoit, E., Foulloy, L. (2003). Functional Ontology for Intelligent Instruments. In: Zhong, N., Raś, Z.W., Tsumoto, S., Suzuki, E. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2871. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39592-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39592-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20256-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39592-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive