Abstract
Often product line engineering is treated similar to the waterfall model in traditional software engineering, i.e., the different phases (scoping, analysis, architecting, implementation) are treated as if they could be clearly separated and would follow each other in an ordered fashion. However, in practice strong interactions between the individual phases become apparent. In particular, how implementation is done has a strong impact on economic aspects of the project and thus how to adequately plan it. Hence, assessing these relationships adequately in the beginning has a strong impact on performing a product line project right.
In this paper we present a framework that helps in exactly this task. It captures on an abstract level the relationships between scoping information and implementation aspects and thus allows to provide rough guidance on implementation aspects of the project. We will also discuss the application of our framework to a specific industrial project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation, Technical Report SPC-92019-CMC (1993)
Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, Version 2.0, Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS), Technical Report STARS-VC-A025/001/00 (1996)
Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., Widen, T., DeBaud, J.-M.: PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Software Reusability 1999, SSR 1999 (May 1999)
DeBaud, J.-M., Schmid, K.: A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 1999 (1999)
Department of Defense - Software Reuse Initiative, Domain Scoping Framework, Version 3.1, Vol. 2, Technical Description (1995)
DeBaud, J.M., Girard, J.F.: The Relation between the Product Line Development Entry Points and Reengineering. In: Proc. of Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architecture for Product Families, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain (February 1998)
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison Wesley, Reading (1998)
Reuse Adoption Guidebook, Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation (1993)
Poulin, J.: Measuring Software Reuse. Addison Wesley, Reading (1997)
Shaw, M., Clements, P.: A Field Guide to Boxology: Preliminary Classification of Architectural Styles for Software Systems. In: Proceedings of COMPSAC 1997, Washington, DC (August 1997)
Krueger, C.: Software Reuse. ACM Computing Surveys 24(2), 131–183 (1992)
DeBaud, J.M.: The Construction of Software Systems using Domain-Specific Reuse Infrastructures, Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA (1996)
Jacobson, I., Griss, M., Jonsson, P.: Software Reuse: Architecture Process and Organization for Business Success. ACM Press, New York (1997)
Birk, A., Kröschel, F.: A Knowledge Management Lifecycle for Experience Packages on Software Engineering Technologies. IESE-Report No. 007.99/E (February 1999)
Perry, D.: Generic Architecture Descriptions for Product Lines. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architecture for Product Families, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, pp. 51–56 (February 1998)
Bayer, J., Flege, O., Gacek, C.: Creating Product Line Architectures. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Architectures for Product Families (IWSAPF- 3) (March 2000)
Bayer, J., Gacek, C., Muthig, D., Widen, T.: PuLSE-I: Deriving Instances from a Product Line Infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE International Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, ECBS (April 2000) (to appear)
Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., Widen, T.: PuLSE TM — Product Line Software Engineering. Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering. IESE-Report No. 020.99/E (1999)
Bayer, J., Girard, J.-F., Würthner, M., DeBaud, J.-M., Apel, M.: Transitioning Legacy Assets to a Product Line Architecture. In: Nierstrasz, O., Lemoine, M. (eds.) ESEC 1999 and ESEC-FSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1687, p. 446. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Gacek, C.: Detecting Architectural Mismatches During System Composition, Ph.D. Dissertation, Center for Software Engineering. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0781, USA (1998)
Kazman, R., Barbacci, M., Klein, M., Carriere, S.J., Woods, S.G.: Experience with Performing Architecture Tradeoff Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1999), pp. 54–63 (1999)
Balzer, R.: An Architectural Infrastructure for Product Families. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architecture for Product Families, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, pp. 158–160 (February 1998)
Althoff, K.D., Birk, A., Hartkopf, S., Müller, W., Nick, M., Surmann, D., Tautz, C.: Managing Software Engineering Experience for Comprehensive Reuse. In: Ruhe, G., Bomarius, F. (eds.) SEKE 1999, vol. 1756, pp. 10–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schmid, K., Gacek, C. (2000). Implementation Issues in Product Line Scoping. In: Frakes, W.B. (eds) Software Reuse: Advances in Software Reusability. ICSR 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1844. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44995-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44995-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67696-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44995-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive