Zusammenfassung
Oft werden zwei mögliche Entwicklungen des Webs diskutiert – das Web 2.0 und das Semantic Web. Wenn wir diese zwei Visionen für das zukünftige Web unter die Lupe nehmen, dann lässt sich feststellen, dass sich die Ideen in ihrem Kern und ihren Technologien gegenseitig ergänzen. Dementsprechend können und sollen beide Visionen von den Erfahrungen und Stärken der anderen profitieren. Wir glauben daran, dass zukünftige Webanwendungen den Web 2.0-Fokus auf Community und Benutzerfreundlichkeit beibehalten und, darüber hinaus, auch von Technologien des Semantic Web zur Vereinfachung der mashupähnlichen Datenintegration profitieren werden. Auf Basis eines Semantic Blog-Szenarios werden wir hier die Vorteile einer möglichen Kombination von Semantic Web und Web 2.0 illustrieren, die zeitnah realisiert werden kann. Wir werden auch auf technische Probleme eingehen, die bei der Erweiterung dieses Szenarios entstehen. Wir stellen dar, wie aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Semantic Web Forschung diese Probleme angehen können, und setzen zugleich auch Schwerpunkte für die zukünftige Forschung, die in diesem Zusammenhang relevant sind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ankolekar, A., Vrandecic, D.: Personalizing Web surfing with semantically enriched peronal profiles. In: M. Bouzid, N. Henze (eds.) Proc. Semantic Web Personalization Workshop. Budva, Montenegro (2006). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/dvr/publications/swp2006.pdf.
Arenas, M., Perez, J.A., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In: I. Cruz, S. Decker (eds.) Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC06), pp. 30–43. Athens, GA, USA (2006).
Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the EL envelope. In: Proc. 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’05). Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, Edinburgh, UK (2005).
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003).
Beged-Dov, G., Brickley, D., Dornfest, R., Davis, I., Dodds, L., Eisenzopf, J., Galbraith, D., Guha, R., MacLeod, K., Miller, E., Swartz, A., van der Vlist, E.: RDF Site Summary 1.0 (9 December 2000). Available at http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/spec.
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 5 (2001).
Bernstein, A., Kaufmann, E., Göhring, A., Kiefer, C.: Querying ontologies: A controlled english interface for end-users. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC05), pp. 112–126 (2005).
Bizer, C., Seaborne, A.: D2RQ – treating non-RDF databases as virtual RDF graphs. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04) (2004).
Braun, S., Schmidt, A., Zacharias, V.: Ontology maturing with lightweight collaborative ontology editing tools. In: Proc. Workshop on Productive Knowledge Work: Management and Technological Challenges (ProKW) (2007).
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M.: Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (second edition). W3C Recommendation REC-xml-20001006, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2000). Available at http://www.w3.org/XML/.
Breslin, J.G., Harth, A., Bojârs, U., Decker, S.: Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: Proc. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC05), Heraklion, Greece, Proceedings, LNCS 3532, pp. 500–514 (2005).
Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation (10 February 2004). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
Brickley, D., Miller, L.: FOAF vocabulary specification, revision (2003). Available at http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/.
Cali, A., Kifer, M.: Containment of conjunctive object meta-queries. In: Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB06), pp. 942–952. VLDB Endowment (2006).
Cayzer, S.: Semantic blogging and decentralized knowledge management. Communications of the ACM 47(12), 47–52 (2004). URL http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-223.html.
Cayzer, S.: What next for semantic blogging? Tech. Rep. HPL-2006-149, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK (2006). URL http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2006/HPL-2006-149.html.
Creative Commons: „Some Rights Reserved“: Building a layer of reasonable copyright. http://creativecommons.org
Dawson, F., Howes, T.: vcard mime directory profile. RFC 2426, Internet Engineering Task Force (1998). URL ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2426.txt
Dawson, F., Stenerson, D.: Internet calendaring and scheduling core object specification (icalendar). RFC 2445, Internet Engineering Task Force (1998). URL ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2445.txt.
Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Pan, R., Cost, R.S., Peng, Y., Reddivari, P., Doshi, V., Sachs, J.: Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the Semantic Web. In: Proc. 13th ACM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 58–61 (2004).
(ed.), B.C.G.: OWL 1.1 web ontology language (November 2006). Available at http://owl1 1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/
(ed.), T.C.: hReview 0.3 (22 February 2006). Available at http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview.
Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – Quick ontology mapping. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04), pp. 683–697. Springer (2004).
Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping – an integrated approach. In: Proc. 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, vol. 3053, pp. 76–91. Springer (2004).
Friedland, N., Allen, P., Matthews, G., Witbrock, M., Baxter, D., Curtis, J., Shepard, B., Miraglia, P., Angele, J., Staab, S., Mönch, E., Oppermann, H., Wenke, D., Porter, B., Barker, K., Fan, J., Chaw, S.Y., Yeh, P., Tecuci, D., Clark, P.: Project Halo: Towards a digital Aristotle. AI Magazine (2004). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/sst/Research/Publications/2004/ai-mag- preprint04.pdf.
Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: FilmTrust: movie recommendations using trust in web-based social networks. In: Proc. IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (2006).
Heath, T., Motta, E.: Reviews and ratings on the semantic web. In: Poster Track, 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2006). Athens, Georgia, USA (2006).
Heflin, J., Pan, J.Z.: A model theoretic semantics for ontology versioning. In: Third International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 62–76. Springer, Hiroshima, Japan (2004).
Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reducing SH IQ- description logic to disjunctive datalog programs. In: Proc. of KR2004, pp. 152–162. AAAI Press (2004).
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Hendler, J.: Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies. Journal of Web Semantics 3 (2005).
Karger, D.R., Quan, D.: What would it mean to blog on the semantic web? In: S.A. McIlraith, D. Plexousakis, F. van Harmelen (eds.) Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04), Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 214–228. Springer (2004).
Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R.W., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The Protege OWL plugin: An open development environment for SemanticWeb applications. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04. Springer (2004).
Lam, J., Pan, J.Z., Sleeman, D., Vasconcelos, W.: A fine-grained approach to resolving unsatisfiable ontologies. In: Proc. of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-2006) (2006).
Lassila, O.: Identity crisis and serendipity (May 2006). Available at http://www.lassila.org/publications/2006/IdentityCrisisAndSerendipity.pdf.
Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L.: Managing multiple and distributed ontologies in the Semantic Web. VLDB Journal 12(4), 286–302 (2003). URL http://www.fzi.de/KCMS/kcms file.php?action=link&id=158.
Manola, F., Miller, E.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) primer. W3C Recommendation (10 February 2004). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/.
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D.. Davis, M.: HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proc. 17th Conf. on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HYPERTEXT’06), pp. 31–40 (2006). URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949.
Mika, P.: Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC05), pp. 522–536 (2005).
Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Integrating description logics and relational databases (Dec 6, 2006). Technical Report, University of Manchester, UK.
Nottingham, M., Sayre, R.: The atom syndication format. RFC 4287, Internet Engineering Task Force (2005). URL ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc4287.txt.
O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0 – design patterns and business models for the next generation of software (2005). Available at http://www.oreillynet.com/ pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
Oren, E., Delbru, R., Decker, S.: Extending faceted navigation for rdf data. In: I. Cruz, S. Decker (eds.) Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC06), pp. 559–572 (2006).
Pan, R., Ding, Z., Yu, Y., Peng, Y.: A Bayesian network approach to ontology mapping. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC05) (2005).
Seaborne, A., Prud’hommeaux, E.: SPARQL query language for RDF. Tech. Rep. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-rdf-sparql-query-20060406/, W3C (2006).
Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.: Web ontology segmentation: Analysis, classification and use. In: Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW 2006), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23–26 (2006).
Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004). W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.
Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: On-to-knowledge methodology. In: S. Staab, R.S. (eds.) (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, Series on Handbooks in Information Systems, chap. 6, pp. 117–132. Springer (2003). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/ 2003ontohandbookot kmethodology.pdf.
Tempich, C., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Staab, S.: An argumentation ontology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering processes of ontologies (DILIGENT). In: Proc. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC05), LNCS 3532, pp. 241–256. Springer (2005).
Vrandecic, D., Krötzsch, M.: Reusing ontological background knowledge in semantic wikis. In: Proceedings of 1st Workshop „From Wiki to Semantics“ (SemWiki’06) (2006).
Vrandecic, D., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C.: The DILIGENT knowledge processes. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(5), 85–96 (2005). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/2005_kmjournal_ diligent.pdf.
Wolstencroft, K., Lord, P., Tabernero, L., Brass, A., Stevens, R.: Using ontology reasoning to classify protein phosphatases. 8th Annual Bio-Ontologies Meeting 2005 24 (2005).
Zacharias, V., Sibler, M.: Semantic announcement sharing. In: Proc. Fachgruppentreffen Wissensmanagement (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ankolekar, A., Krötzsch, M., Tran, T., Vrandecic, D. (2009). Die zwei Kulturen. In: Blumauer, A., Pellegrini, T. (eds) Social Semantic Web. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72215-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72216-8
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)