Abstract
Despite the active research on XML retrieval, it is a great challenge to determine the contexts where the methods can be applied and where the proven results hold. Therefore, having a common taxonomy for the use cases of XML retrieval is useful when presenting the scope of the research. The taxonomy also helps us design more focused user studies that have an increased validity. In the current state, the taxonomy covers most common uses of applying Information Retrieval to XML documents. We are delighted to see how some of the use cases match the tasks of the INEX participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broder, A.: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36, 3–10 (2002)
Chidlovskii, B., Fuselier, J.: Supervised learning for the legacy document conversion. In: DocEng 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Document engineering, pp. 220–228. ACM Press, New York, USA (2004)
Weitzman, L., Dean, S.E., Meliksetian, D., Gupta, K., Zhou, N., Wu, J.: Transforming the content management process at ibm.com. In: CHI 2002. Case studies of the CHI2002/AIGA Experience Design FORUM, pp. 1–15. ACM Press, New York, USA (2002)
Clark, D.: Rhetoric of present single-sourcing methodologies. In: SIGDOC 2002. Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation, pp. 20–25. ACM Press, New York, USA (2002)
Chu-Carroll, J., Prager, J., Czuba, K., Ferrucci, D., Duboue, P.: Semantic search via XML fragments: a high-precision approach to IR. In: SIGIR 2006. Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 445–452. ACM Press, New York, USA (2006)
ASTM International: E2210-02 Standard Specification for Guideline Elements Model (GEM)-Document Model for Clinical Practice Guidelines (2003)
Belkin, N.J., Croft, W.B.: Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin? Commun. ACM 35, 29–38 (1992)
W3C: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation (March 27, 2006) Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20
Dong, X., Halevy, A.Y., Madhavan, J., Nemes, E., Zhang, J.: Similarity search for web services. In: VLDB 2004. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 372–383 (2004)
W3C: SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer (Second Edition), W3C Proposed Edited Recommendation (19 December 2006) Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lehtonen, M., Pharo, N., Trotman, A. (2007). A Taxonomy for XML Retrieval Use Cases. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Trotman, A. (eds) Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems. INEX 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4518. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73888-6_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73888-6_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73887-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73888-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)