Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Pex–White Box Test Generation for .NET

  • Conference paper
Tests and Proofs (TAP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4966))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Pex automatically produces a small test suite with high code coverage for a .NET program. To this end, Pex performs a systematic program analysis (using dynamic symbolic execution, similar to path-bounded model-checking) to determine test inputs for Parameterized Unit Tests. Pex learns the program behavior by monitoring execution traces. Pex uses a constraint solver to produce new test inputs which exercise different program behavior. The result is an automatically generated small test suite which often achieves high code coverage. In one case study, we applied Pex to a core component of the .NET runtime which had already been extensively tested over several years. Pex found errors, including a serious issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anand, S., Godefroid, P., Tillmann, N.: Demand-driven compositional symbolic execution. Technical Report MSR-TR-2007-138, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA (October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anand, S., Pasareanu, C.S., Visser, W.: Jpf-se: A symbolic execution extension to java pathfinder. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 134–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjorner, N., de Moura, L.: Z3: An efficient SMT solver (2007), http://research.microsoft.com/projects/Z3

  4. Boshernitsan, M., Doong, R., Savoia, A.: From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testing. In: ISSTA 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Software testing and analysis, pp. 169–180. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Brace, K.S., Rudell, R.L., Bryant, R.E.: Efficient implementation of a BDD package. In: DAC 1990: Proceedings of the 27th ACM/IEEE conference on Design automation, pp. 40–45. ACM Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cadar, C., Ganesh, V., Pawlowski, P.M., Dill, D.L., Engler, D.R.: Exe: automatically generating inputs of death. In: CCS 2006: Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pp. 322–335. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Csallner, C., Tillmann, N., Smaragdakis, Y.: Dysy: Dynamic symbolic execution for invariant inference. Technical Report MSR-TR-2007-151, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA (November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engler, D., Dunbar, D.: Under-constrained execution: making automatic code destruction easy and scalable. In: ISSTA 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Software testing and analysis, pp. 1–4. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ernst, M.D., Perkins, J.H., Guo, P.J., McCamant, S., Pacheco, C., Tschantz, M.S., Xiao, C.: The Daikon system for dynamic detection of likely invariants. Science of Computer Programming (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flanagan, C., Leino, K.R.M., Lillibridge, M., Nelson, G., Saxe, J.B., Stata, R.: Extended static checking for Java. In: Proc. the ACM SIGPLAN 2002 Conference on Programming language design and implementation, pp. 234–245. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Godefroid, P.: Compositional dynamic test generation. In: POPL 2007: Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, pp. 47–54. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., Sen, K.: DART: directed automated random testing. SIGPLAN Notices 40(6), 213–223 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Godefroid, P., Levin, M.Y., Molnar, D.: Automated whitebox fuzz testing. Technical Report MSR-TR-2007-58, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grieskamp, W., Tillmann, N., Schulte, W.: XRT - Exploring Runtime for .NET - Architecture and Applications. In: SoftMC 2005: Workshop on Software Model Checking, July 2005. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. International. Standard ECMA-335, Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. King, J.C.: Symbolic execution and program testing. Commun. ACM 19(7), 385–394 (1976)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Korel, B.: A dynamic approach of test data generation. In: IEEE Conference On Software Maintenance, November 1990, pp. 311–317 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Korel, B., Al-Yami, A.M.: Assertion-oriented automated test data generation. In: Proc. the 18th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 71–80. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Majumdar, R., Sen, K.: Latest: Lazy dynamic test input generation. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2007-36, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley (Mar 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Two, M.C., Poole, C., Cansdale, J., Feldman, G., Newkirk, J.W., Vorontsov, A.A., Craig, P.A.: NUnit, http://www.nunit.org/

  21. Microsoft. Net framework general reference - profiling (unmanaged api reference), http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404386.aspx

  22. Microsoft. Visual Studio Team System, Team Edition for Testers, http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vsts2008/products/bb933754.aspx

  23. Pacheco, C., Lahiri, S.K., Ernst, M.D., Ball, T.: Feedback-directed random test generation. In: ICSE 2007, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, USA, May 23–25 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pex development team. Pex (2007), http://research.microsoft.com/Pex

  25. Saff, D., Boshernitsan, M., Ernst, M.D.: Theories in practice: Easy-to-write specifications that catch bugs. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2008-002, MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, January 14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sen, K., Agha, G.: CUTE and jCUTE: Concolic unit testing and explicit path model-checking tools. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) CAV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 419–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Sen, K., Marinov, D., Agha, G.: Cute: a concolic unit testing engine for c. In: ESEC/FSE-13: Proceedings of the 10th European software engineering conference held jointly with 13th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pp. 263–272. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Tillmann, N., Schulte, W.: Parameterized unit tests. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Software Engineering Conference held jointly with 13th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 253–262. ACM, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Tillmann, N., Schulte, W.: Unit tests reloaded: Parameterized unit testing with symbolic execution. IEEE Software 23(4), 38–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052, USA

    Nikolai Tillmann & Jonathan de Halleux

Authors
  1. Nikolai Tillmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan de Halleux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Bernhard Beckert Reiner Hähnle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tillmann, N., de Halleux, J. (2008). Pex–White Box Test Generation for .NET. In: Beckert, B., Hähnle, R. (eds) Tests and Proofs. TAP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4966. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79124-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79124-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79123-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79124-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation