Abstract
Though Gennaro et al. discussed the algorithmic tamper proof (ATP) devices using the personal identification number (PIN) with less tamper-proof devices, and proposed counter units which count the number of wrong attempts in user authentication; however, as for the counter unit, they only constructed one which counts the total number of wrong attempts. Although large number for the limit of wrong attempts is required for usability, it allows an attacker to search PIN up to the limit and degrades the security. The construction of secure counter units which count the number of consecutive wrong attempts remains as an open problem. In this paper, we first formalize the ATP security of counter units, and propose two constructions of counter unit which count the number of consecutive wrong attempts. The security of each construction can be proven under the assumptions of secure signature scheme and random function. The former one is required to store two states in secure memory area (RP − Mem) with low computation cost; and the latter one has high computation cost but is required to store only one state in RP − Mem. This shows the trade-off between the costs of hardware and algorithm.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ateniese, G., de Medeiros, B.: On the key exposure problem in chameleon hashes. In: Blundo, C., Cimato, S. (eds.) SCN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3352, pp. 165–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Boneh, D., DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J.: On the importance of checking cryptographic protocols for faults. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Gennaro, R., Lysyanskaya, A., Malkin, T., Micali, S., Rabin, T.: Algorithmic tamper-proof (ATP) security: Theoretical foundations for security against hardware tampering. In: Naor, M. (ed.) TCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2951, pp. 258–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., Micali, S.: How to construct random functions. In: 25th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1984), pp. 464–479. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1984)
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., Rivest, R.: A digital signature scheme against adaptive chosen message attack. Journal of Computing (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) 17(2), 281–308 (1988)
Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Chameleon signatures. In: Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, NDSS 2000. The Internet Society (2000)
Tuyls, P., Schrijen, G.-J., Škorić, B., van Geloven, J., Verhaegh, N., Wolters, R.: Read-proof hardware from protective coatings. In: Goubin, L., Matsui, M. (eds.) CHES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4249, pp. 369–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Komano, Y., Ohta, K., Miyake, H., Shimbo, A. (2009). Algorithmic Tamper Proof (ATP) Counter Units for Authentication Devices Using PIN. In: Abdalla, M., Pointcheval, D., Fouque, PA., Vergnaud, D. (eds) Applied Cryptography and Network Security. ACNS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5536. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01957-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01957-9_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01956-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01957-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)