Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

On Component Identification Approaches – Classification, State of the Art, and Comparison

  • Conference paper
Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5582))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 805 Accesses

Abstract

Partitioning a design space to identify components with desired non-functional and behavioral characteristics is a crucial task in the component-based software development process. Accordingly, the issue of how to analyze design models in order to systematically derive a set of components constitutes a research question which has been investigated repeatedly. Component identification approaches that have been published in literature, however, make use of different component definitions and identification strategies. Furthermore, they vary from ad-hoc findings and general recommendations to more formalized methods and techniques which aim at an optimized partitioning. In this paper, we elaborate on the state of the art in component identification and provide a classification of approaches that highlights their respective strengths and weaknesses. To classify component identification approaches, we introduce a classification scheme that contains important distinguishing factors. It is used to compare existing approaches which have been compiled during a literature survey. In addition, it provides the basis to discuss significant differences between them and to identify remaining issues which give information about future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, A.W.: Large-Scale, Component-Based Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheesman, J., Daniels, J.: UML Components. A Simple Process for Specifying Component-Based Software. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Szyperski, C., Gruntz, D., Murer, S.: Component Software. Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Speed, J., Councill, W.T., Heineman, G.T.: Component-Based Software Engineering as a Unique Engineering Discipline. In: Councill, W.T., Heineman, G.T. (eds.) Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting the Pieces Together, pp. 673–691. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albani, A., Overhage, S., Birkmeier, D.: Towards a Systematic Method for Identifying Business Components. In: Chaudron, M.R.V., Szyperski, C., Reussner, R. (eds.) CBSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5282, pp. 262–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Baster, G., Konana, P., Scott, J.: Business Components - A Case Study of Bankers Trust Australia Limited. Communications of the ACM 44, 92–98 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Herzum, P., Sims, O.: Business Component Factory: A Comprehensive Overview of Component-Based Development for the Enterprise. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Object Management Group (OMG): Unified Modeling Language Specification: Version 2, Revised Final Adopted Specification, ptc/05-07-04 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Broy, M.: Towards a Mathematical Concept of a Component and its Use. Software - Concepts and Tools 18, 137–159 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. D’Souza, D.F., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML. In: The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parnas, D.L.: On the Criteria to be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules. Communications of the ACM 15, 1053–1058 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook, S., Daniels, J.: Designing Object Systems. In: Object-Oriented Modelling with Syntropy. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Atkinson, C., Bayer, J., Bunse, C., Kamsties, E., Laitenberger, O., Lagua, R., Muthig, D., Paech, B., Wust, J., Zettel, J.: Component-Based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. IBM Corporation: Business Systems Planning: Information Systems Planning Guide. Technical report ge20-0527-4, International Business Machines Corporation (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., Huh, M.: FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain-Specific Reference Architectures. Annals of Software Engineering 5, 143–168 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, S.D., Yang, Y.J., Cho, E.S., Kim, S.D., Rhew, S.Y.: COMO: A UML-Based Component Development Methodology. In: APSEC 1999: Proceedings of the Sixth Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA, p. 54. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sugumaran, V., Tanniru, M., Storey, V.C.: Identifying Software Components from Process Requirements Using Domain Model and Object Libraries. In: ICIS ’99: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA, Association for Information Systems, pp. 65–81 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ganesan, R., Sengupta, S.: O2BC: A Technique for the Design of Component-Based Applications. In: TOOLS 2001: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference and Exhibition on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems (TOOLS39), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 46–55. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Jain, H., Chalimeda, N., Ivaturi, N., Reddy, B.: Business Component Identification - A Formal Approach. In: EDOC 2001: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 183–187. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, J.K., Jung, S.J., Kim, S.D., Jang, W.H., Ham, D.H.: Component Identification Method with Coupling and Cohesion. In: Proceedings of the 8th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2001), Macau, China, Washington, DC, USA, December 4-7, pp. 79–86. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levi, K., Arsanjani, A.: A Goal-Driven Approach to Enterprise Component Identification and Specification. Communications of the ACM 45, 45–52 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jang, Y.J., Kim, E.Y., Lee, K.W.: Object-Oriented Component Identification Method Using the Affinity Analysis Technique. In: Konstantas, D., Léonard, M., Pigneur, Y., Patel, S. (eds.) OOIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2817, pp. 317–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, S.D., Chang, S.H.: A Systematic Method to Identify Software Components. In: APSEC 2004: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 538–545. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Albani, A., Dietz, J.L., Zaha, J.M.: Identifying Business Components on the Basis of an Enterprise Ontology. In: Konstantas, D., Bourrieres, J.P., Leonard, M., Boudjlida, N. (eds.) Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 335–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Albani, A., Dietz, J.L.: The Benefit of Enterprise Ontology in Identifying Business Components. In: IFIP World Computing Conference, Santiago de Chile, Chile (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Blois, A.P.T.B., Werner, C.M.L., Becker, K.: Towards a Components Grouping Technique within a Domain Engineering Process. In: EUROMICRO 2005: Proceedings of the 31st EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 18–27. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meng, F.C., Zhan, D.C., Xu, X.F.: Business Component Identification of Enterprise Information System: A Hierarchical Clustering Method. In: Lau, F.C.M., Lei, H., Meng, X., Wang, M. (eds.) ICEBE, pp. 473–480. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Z., Xu, X., Zhan, D.: A Survey of Business Component Identification Methods and Related Techniques. International Journal of Information Technology 2, 229–238 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Component and Service Engineering Group, Business Informatics and Systems Engineering Chair, University of Augsburg, Universitaetsstrasse 16, 86159, Augsburg, Germany

    Dominik Birkmeier & Sven Overhage

Authors
  1. Dominik Birkmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sven Overhage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Software Engineering Institute, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon® http://www.sei.cmu.edu/staff/glewis, 4500 Fifth Ave., PA 15213, Pittsburgh, USA

    Grace A. Lewis

  2. The Predictable Assembly Laboratory, , Department of Computer Science,, King’s College London, Strand, http://palab.dcs.kcl.ac.uk, WC2R 2LS, London, UK

    Iman Poernomo

  3. Computer Science Department, East Stroudsburg University, http://www.esu.edu/~chrish, 200 Prospect Street, PA 18301-2999, East Stroudsburg, USA

    Christine Hofmeister

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Birkmeier, D., Overhage, S. (2009). On Component Identification Approaches – Classification, State of the Art, and Comparison. In: Lewis, G.A., Poernomo, I., Hofmeister, C. (eds) Component-Based Software Engineering. CBSE 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5582. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02414-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02414-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02413-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02414-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation