Abstract
With rapid advances in information and communication technology, computer-mediated communication (CMC) technologies are utilizing multiple IT platforms such as email, websites, cell-phones/PDAs, social networking sites, and gaming environments. However, no studies have compared the effectiveness of a persuasive system using such alternative channels and various persuasive techniques. Moreover, how affective computing impacts the effectiveness of persuasive systems is not clear. This study proposes (1) persuasive technology channels in combination with persuasive strategies will have different persuasive effectiveness; (2) Adding positive emotion to a message that leads to a better overall user experience could increase persuasive effectiveness. The affective computing or emotion information was added to the experiment using emoticons. The initial results of a pilot study show that computer-mediated communication channels along with various persuasive strategies can affect the persuasive effectiveness to varying degrees. These results also shows that adding a positive emoticon to a message leads to a better user experience which increases the overall persuasive effectiveness of a system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24 (2009)
Chatterjee, S., Price, A.: Healthy Living with Persuasive Technologies: Framework, Issues, and Challenges. Journal of the American Medical Information Association 16, 171–178 (2009)
Wilson, E.V.: Perceived effectiveness of interpersonal persuasion strategies in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 537–552 (2003)
Picard, R.W.: Affective computing (1995)
Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J.: Designing empathic computers: the effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 1–9. ACM, Claremont (2009)
Reitberger, W., Meschtscherjakov, A., Mirlacher, T., Scherndl, T., Huber, H., Tscheligi, M.: A persuasive interactive mannequin for shop windows. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 1–8. ACM, Claremont (2009)
Torning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 1–8. ACM, Claremont (2009)
Roto, V., Rautava, M.: User Experience Elements and Brand Promise. In: International Engagability & Design Conference, in conjunction with NordiCHI 2008, Lund, Sweden (2008)
Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Science Research in Infomration Systems. In: Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice, ch. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (1994)
Perloff, R.M.: The dynamics of persuasion: communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007)
Fogg, B.J.: Overview of captology. Persuasive Technology, pp. 15–22. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)
Ajzen, I.: Persuasive Communication Theory in Social Psychology: A Historical Psychology. In: Manfredo, M.J. (ed.) Influencing Human Behavior Theory and Applications in Recreation and Tourism Natural Resources. Sagamore Publishing (1992)
Holbert, R.L.: Embodied meaning of media form. In: Dillard, J.P., Pfau, M. (eds.) The persuasion handbook: developments in theory and practice. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2002)
Fogg, B.: Creating persuasive technologies: An eight-step design process. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 1–6. ACM, Claremont (2009)
Paola, D.B., Luca, M.: Computer-mediated communication and persuasion: Peripheral vs. Central route to opinion shift. Computers in Human Behavior 24(3), 798–815 (2007)
Cugelman, B., Thelwall, M., Dawes, P.: Communication-based influence components model. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 1–9. ACM, Claremont (2009)
Ramachandran, D., Canny, J.: The Persuasive Power of Human-Machine Dialogue. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 189–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Guadagno, R.E., Cialdini, R.B.: Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6, 38–51 (2002)
Zhu, W.: Promoting Physical Activity Through Internet: A Persuasive Technology View. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 12–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Reynolds, C., Picard, R.W.: Designing for Affective Interactions. In: Processding of 9th International Conf. on HumanComputer Interaction, New Orleans, p. 499 (2001)
Nabi, R.L.: Discrete Emotions and Persuasion. In: Dillard, J.P., Pfau, M. (eds.) The persuasion handbook: developments in theory and practice. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2002)
Walther, J.B., D’Addario, K.P.: The impact of Emotions on Message Intrepretation in Computer Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review 19(3), 324–347 (2001)
Derks, D., Fischerb, A.H., Bosc, A.E.R.: The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 766–785 (2008)
Huang, A.H., Yen, D.C., Zhang, X.: Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Information & Management 45, 466–473 (2008)
Bevan, N.: UX, Usability and ISO Standards. In: CHI 2008. ACM, Florence (2008)
Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 719–728. ACM, Boston (2009)
Segerstahl, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Distributed User Experience in Persuasive Technology Environments. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 80–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Megha, M., Samir, C., David, D.: Exploring the Persuasiveness of ”Just-in-time” Motivational Messages for Obesity Management. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 258–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Hawn, C.: Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff. (Millwood) 28, 361–368
Bettinghaus, E.P.: Health promotion and the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuum. Preventive Medicine 15, 475–491 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, H., Chatterjee, S. (2010). Designing Effective Persuasive Systems Utilizing the Power of Entanglement: Communication Channel, Strategy and Affect. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13225-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13226-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)