Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An Evaluation of BPMN Modeling Tools

  • Conference paper
Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 67))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2263 Accesses

Abstract

Various BPMN modeling tools are available and it is close to impossible to understand their functional differences without simply trying them out. This paper presents an evaluation framework and presents the outcomes of its application to a set of five BPMN modeling tools. We report on various differences, for example with respect to the level of BPMN support and the “smart” support a modeler may experience using these tools. Interestingly, while tools that are provided by commercial parties do offer more integration options with other tools in BPM suites, they cannot be said to outperform academic tools in other respects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BizAgi, http://www.bizagi.com/

  2. DiaGen, http://www.unibw.de/inf2/DiaGen/assistance/bpm

  3. Decker, G., Overdick, H., Weske, M.: Oryx C An Open Modeling Platform for the BPM Community. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 382–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallwyl, T., Henglein, F., Hildebrandt, T.: A Standard-driven Implementation of WS-BPEL 2.0. In: Proceedings of SAC 2010, Sierre, Switzerland, pp. 2472–2476 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helkiö, P., Seppälä, A., Syd, O.: Evaluation of Intalio BPM Tool, T-86.5161 Special Course in Information System Integration (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Intalio, http://www.intalio.com/

  7. Mazanek, S., Minas, M.: Business Process Models as a Showcase for Syntax-based Assistance in Diagram Editors. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 322–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nüttgens, M.: An Evaluation Framework for Business Process Modelling Tools, http://www.cimosa.de/IctSupport/ToolSt-mn02.html

  9. Oryx, http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/Oryx/WebHome

  10. Schmietendorf, A.: Assessment of Business Process Modeling Tools under Consideration of Business Process Management Activities. In: Dumke, R.R., Braungarten, R., Büren, G., Abran, A., Cuadrado-Gallego, J.J. (eds.) IWSM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5338, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro, R.: Model Portability Overview and Goals (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tibco Team. Business Process Modeling, http://www.tibco.com/multimedia/business-process-modelling_tcm8-2404.pdf

  13. Tibco, http://www.tibco.com/products/bpm/process-modeling/default.jsp

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, NL-5600, MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Zhiqiang Yan, Hajo A. Reijers & Remco M. Dijkman

Authors
  1. Zhiqiang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hajo A. Reijers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Remco M. Dijkman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany

    Jan Mendling

  2. Hasso Plattner Institute for Software Systems Engineering, University of Potsdam, Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3, 14482, Potsdam, Germany

    Matthias Weidlich

  3. Hasso-Plattner-Institute for Software Systems Engineering, University of Potsdam, Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3, 14482, Potsdam, Germany

    Mathias Weske

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yan, Z., Reijers, H.A., Dijkman, R.M. (2010). An Evaluation of BPMN Modeling Tools. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M., Weske, M. (eds) Business Process Modeling Notation. BPMN 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 67. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16298-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16298-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16297-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16298-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation