Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

The Evaluation of Hydraulic Engineering Scheme Based on Choquet Fuzzy Integral

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China

Part of the book series: Computational Risk Management ((Comp. Risk Mgmt))

  • 1147 Accesses

Abstract

It is often difficult to establish an indicator system to evaluate the hydraulic engineering scheme where the indicators are mutually independent and the project attributes can be revealed comprehensively. In the paper, firstly, probabilistic measures are calculated by diversity between indicators from different and uniform hydraulic engineering scheme based on information entropy and variable weights. Secondly, optimal model of fuzzy measure is built by means of Shapley value definition of multi-people collaborative gambles and Marichal entropy theory, thus the probabilistic measure can be converted to fuzzy measures. Thirdly, on the basis of Choquet integral definition, synthetical evaluation of alternative schemes is calculated according to the known value from bottom to top. The demonstration shows that the method is feasible to array the order of hydraulic engineering scheme, and that computational complexity obviously increases with increasing indictor numbers and application scope of the method will be greatly widened with the improvement of the optimal algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ding Y, Liang CY, Fang BH (2007) Application of multi-reservoir flood control systems based on evidence theory [J]. Adv Water Sci 18(4):591–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukhovny AD (2002) General entropy of general measures. Int J Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 10(3):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gader PD, Monhanmed MA, Keller JM (1996) Dynamic-programming-based handwritten word recognition using the Choquet fuzzy integral as the match function. J Electronic Imag 5(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan T, Feng BQ (2004) Roughness of Choquet fuzzy integral and information fusion. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ 38(12):1251–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly A (2007) Decision making using game theory: an introduction for managers. Peking University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Li DQ, Li HX (2004) Analysis of variable weights effect and selection of appropriate state variable weights vector in decision making. Cont Decision 19(11):1241–1245

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HL, Wang XG, Cui YL et al (2006) Comprehensive evaluation methods for irrigation district. Adv Water Sci 17(4):543–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YX, Li X, Zhuang ZW (2003) Decision-level information fusion for target recognition based on Choquet fuzzy integral. J Electronics Inform Technol 25(5):695–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu YY, Wu XQ (2006) Evaluation for data fusion system based on generalized relative entropy. J Syst Simulation 18(5):1283–1285

    Google Scholar 

  • Marichal JL (2002) Entropy of discrete Choquet capacities. Eur J Oper Res 137(3):612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murofushi T, Sugeno M (1989) An interpretation of fuzzy measure and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure. Fuzzy Sets Syst 29(2):201–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie XT, Lu YW (2006) Water conservancy project construction scheme selection based on fuzzy decision making [J]. Water Resour Power 24(3):46–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandanee AW, Keller JM, Paul D (2002) Generalized Choquet fuzzy integral fusion. Inform Fusion 3(7):69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue CS, Jin JL, Wei YM (2005) Projection pursuit method for optimizing water resources project schemes. J Yangtze River Scient Res Inst 22(4):80–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1994) A class of fuzzy measures generated from a Dempster-Shafer belief structure. Int J Intelligent Syst 14(12):1239–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HJ, Li N, Du ZX (2005) The ideal scheme method applied in the choice of water project. J N China Inst Water Conservancy Hydroelectric Power 26(4):66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XQ, Liang C, Liu HQ (2005) Application of attribute recognition model based on coefficient of entropy to comprehensive evaluation of groundwater quality. J Sichuan Univ 37(3):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CY, Wang ZF, Xing HG (2007) Risk assessment system for bidding of construction projects based on Choquet fuzzy integral. China Civil Eng J 40(10):98–104

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ling, C., Zheng, R. (2011). The Evaluation of Hydraulic Engineering Scheme Based on Choquet Fuzzy Integral. In: Wu, D., Zhou, Y. (eds) Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China. Computational Risk Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18387-4_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics