Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Meta-model-Framework for Structuring the Requirement Analysis in Process Design

  • Conference paper
Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research (DESRIST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6629))

  • 4130 Accesses

Abstract

Today, with process management generally established as an integrated management tool, there is a strong interest in process modeling. The organizations spent time and effort in generating the optimal process model. Although there is a multitude of process modeling techniques available, the modeling process is often inefficient and the results are not satisfying. As each use case makes other demands on a process modeling language and tool it may be due to the neglect of some aspect of the design phase supposed to include a comprehensive requirement analysis and the implementation of these in an appropriate language and tool. Thus we want to offer a framework which focuses more on the design phase. The approach is based on a meta model hierarchy, focusing on modeling. This hierarchy is extended with a design phase. The increased quality of the final process models will also influence the whole process life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Prak, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glass, R.: On Design. IEEE Software 16, 103–104 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling - A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Association for Information Systems 10, 333–363 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Recker, J., Mendling, J.: Adequacy in Process Modeling: A Review of Measures and a Proposed Research Agenda. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development and Support, Trontheim (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosemann, M.: Potential Pitfalls of Process Modeling: part A. Business Process Management Journal 12, 249–254 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OMG: BPMN Business Process Modeling Notation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. OMG: Unified Modeling Language (UML) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55, 243–276 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abecker, A., Hinkelmann, K., Maus, H., Müller, H.J.: Geschäftsprozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement – Effektive Wissensnutzung bei der Planung um Umsetzung von Geschäftsprozessen, vol. 1. Aufage Springer Verlag, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Allweyer, T.: Geschäftsprozessmanagement – Strategie, Entwurf, Implementierung, Controlling. W3L-Verlag, Herdecke (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, J., Kugler, M., Rosemann, M.: Process management. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrington, H.J.: Total Improvement Management - The Next Generation in Performance Improvement. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, R.G., Dale, B.G.: Business Process Management: A Review and Evaluation. Business Process Management Journal 4, 214–225 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmelzer, H.J., Sesselmann, W.: Geschäftsprozessmanagement in der Praxis, vol. 6. vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage Carl Hanser Verlag, München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weske, M.: Business Process Management - Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hofacker, I., Vetschera, R.: Algorithmical Approaches to Business Process Design. Computer & Operational Research 28, 1253–1275 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Reijers, H.: Design and Control of Workflow Processes: Business Process Management for the Service Industry. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Reijers, H.A., Netjes, M., Vanderfeesten, I.: On pragmatic and formal process design aproaches. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support, Trontheim (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business process management: A survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of Petri Net to Workflow Management The Journal of Curciuts. Systems and Computers 8, 21–66 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reijers, H.A., Liman, M.S.: Best practice in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of succesful redesign heuristics Omega (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davenport, T.H., Short, J.E.: The New Industrial Engineering: Informationtechnology and Business Process Redesign. IEEE Management Review (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malone, T.W., Crowstone, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, J., Osborn, C., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., Klein, M., O’Donnell, E.: Tools for Inventing Organizations: Towards a Handbook for Organizational Processes. Management Science 45 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zairi, M., Sinclair, D.: Business process re-engineering and processmanagement - A survey of current practice and future trends in integrated management. Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal 1, 8–30 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aktinson, C., Kühne, T.: Concepts for comparing modeling tool architectures. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 398–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Aktinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, p. 19. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Henderson-Seller, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C.: A power-type-based metamodeling framework. Software and System Modeling 5, 72–90 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karagiannis, D., Kühn, H.: Metamodelling Platforms. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) EC-Web 2002. LNCS, vol. 2455, p. 182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. OMG: MOF 2.0 Specification (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frank, U.: Evaluating Modelling Languages: Relevant Issues, Epistemological Challenges and a Preliminary Research Framework. Arbeitsbericht des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Koblenz, vol. 15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frank, U., van Laak, B.D.: Anforderungen an Sprachen zur Modellierung von Geschäftsprozessen. In: Frank, U., Hampe, F. (eds.) Arbeitsbericht des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 34. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz-Landau (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Volz, B., Jablonski, S.: Towards an Open Meta Modeling Environment. In: 10th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM 2010) Reno/Tahoe, Nevada, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Volz, B., Jablonski, S.: OMME - A Flexible Modeling Environment. Workshop on Flexible Modeling Tools (FlexiTools@SPLASH 2010), Reno/Tahoe, Nevada, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meerkamm, S.: Configuration of Multi-Perspectives Variants. In: 1st. Int’l. Workshop on Reuse in Business Process Management (rBPM 2010), Hoboken, NJ, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meerkamm, S., Jablonski, S. (2011). A Meta-model-Framework for Structuring the Requirement Analysis in Process Design. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics