Abstract
This paper proposes and synthesizes from previous design science (DS) methodological literature a structured and detailed DS Roadmap for the conduct of DS research. The Roadmap is a general guide for researchers to carry out DS research by suggesting reasonably detailed activities. Though highly tentative, it is believed the Roadmap usefully inter-relates many otherwise seemingly disparate, overlapping or conflicting concepts. It is hoped the DS Roadmap will aid in the planning, execution and communication of DS research, while also attracting constructive criticism, improvements and extensions. A key distinction of the Roadmap from other DS research methods is its breadth of coverage of DS research aspects and activities; its detail and scope. We demonstrate and evaluate the Roadmap by presenting two case studies in terms of the DS Roadmap.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 39–64 (2007)
Kuechler, W.L., Vaishnavi, V.K.: The emergence of design research in information systems in North America. Journal of Design Research 7(1), 1–16 (2008)
Samuel-Ojo, O., et al.: Meta-analysis of Design Science Research within the IS Community: Trends, Patterns, and Outcomes. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 124–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
March, S.T., Storey, V.C.: Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 725–730 (2008)
Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology. Auerbach Publication, Taylor & Francis Group, NY (2007)
Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M.: A Multi-Grounded Design Research Process. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 45–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 470–475 (2008)
Iivari, J., Venable, J.: Action research and design science research–seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In: 17th European Conference on Information Systems (2009)
Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft design science methodology. In: DESRIST 2009. ACM, Malvern (2009)
Hevner, A.R.: A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 87–92 (2007)
Järvinen, P.: Action research is similar to design science. Quality and Quantity 41(1), 37–54 (2007)
Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Minder, C., Titus, D.M.P.: Systems development in information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 7(3), 89–106 (1991)
March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)
Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007)
Rossi, M., Sein, M.K.: Design research workshop: a proactive research approach. Presentation delivered at IRIS 26, 9–12 (2003)
Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design research in information systems, February 20 (2004), http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm (cited January 10, 2010)
Venable, J.: A Framework for Design Science Research Activities. In: Information Resource Management Association Conference (CD), Washington, DC, USA. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2006)
Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)
Indulska, M., Recker, J.C.: Design science in IS research: a literature analysis. In: Proceedings 4th Biennial ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia (2008)
Venable, J.: Design Science Research Post Hevner et al.: Criteria, Standards, Guidelines, and Expectations. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 109–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 43–58 (1992)
Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)
Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C., Gage, N.L.: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin, Dallas (1966)
Kline, R.B.: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York (2005)
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)
Lee, J., Wyner, G.M., Pentland, B.T.: Process grammar as a tool for business process design. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 757–778 (2008)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: The design theory nexus. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 731–755 (2008)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Introduction to the special issue on design science. Information Systems and E-Business Management 9(1), 1–9 (2010)
Nunamaker Jr, J.F., Chen, M., Purdin, T.D.M.: Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(3), 89–106 (1991)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Galway, Ireland (2008)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Evaluation Risks in Design Science Research: A Framework. In: Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. Georgia State University, Atlanta (2008)
Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information systems-a need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 59–72 (2004)
Venable, J.: The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research. In: Proceedings of DESRIST 2006, Claremont, CA (2006)
Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155–169 (1973)
Österle, H., et al.: Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 7–10 (2010)
Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: The role of applicability checks. MIS Quarterly 32(1), 1–22 (2008)
Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.W.: Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 3–16 (1999)
Owen, C.L.: Design research: building the knowledge base. Design Studies 19(1), 9–20 (1998)
Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies 41(2), 219–246 (2004)
Cole, R., et al.: Being proactive: where action research meets design research. In: Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems. Citeseer, Atlanta (2005)
Baskerville, R., et al.: A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 11–15 (2010)
Simon, H.A.: The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 489–504 (2008)
Takeda, H., et al.: Modeling design process. AI Magazine 11(4), 37 (1990)
Venable, J.: Identifying and Addressing Stakeholder Interests in Design Science Research: An Analysis Using Critical Systems Heuristics. In: Dhillon, G., Stahl, B.C., Baskerville, R. (eds.) CreativeSME 2009. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 301, pp. 93–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Baskerville, R.: What design science is not. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 441–443 (2008)
Järvinen, P.: On reviewing of results in design research. In: The 15th European Conference on Information Systems, Switzerland (2007)
Purao, S.: Design research in the technology of information systems: Truth or dare, Unpublished Working Paper, Atlanta (2002)
Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Desperately seeking the’IT’in IT research-a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121–134 (2001)
Offermann, P., et al.: Artifact Types in Information Systems Design Science – A Literature Review. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alturki, A., Gable, G.G., Bandara, W. (2011). A Design Science Research Roadmap. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)