Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Students’ Understanding of Their Student Model

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6738))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Open Learner Models (OLM) are believed to facilitate students’ metacognitive activities in learning. Inspectable student models are a simple but very common form of OLM that grant students opportunities to get feedback on their knowledge and reflect on it. This paper uses individualized surveys and interviews with high school students who have at least three years experience learning with the Cognitive Tutor regarding the inspectable student model in the Tutor. We also interviewed a teacher. We found that: i) students pay close attention to the OLM and report that seeing it change encourages them to learn; ii) there is a significant discrepancy between the students’ self-assessment and the system’s assessment; iii) students generally rely on the OLM to make judgments of their learning progress without much active reflection. We discuss potential revisions to the student model based on the findings, which aim to enhance students’ reflection on and self-assessment of their own learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Mehranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S., Woolf, B.: Repairing Disengagement with Non Invasive Interventions. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Marina del Rey, CA, pp. 195–202 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bull, S.: Supporting Learning with Open Learner Models. In: 4th Hellenic Conference: Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI Open Learner Modeling Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 89–120 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Metacognition and Open Learner Models. In: Proceedings of Third Workshop Meta-Cognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies, ITS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett, A., McLaughlin, M., Scarpinatto, K.: Modeling Student Knowledge: Cognitive Tutor in High School & College. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10, 81–108 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitrović, A.: Investigating students’ self-assessment skills. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds.) UM 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2109, pp. 247–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning. In: de Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds.) Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems, pp. 296–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritter, S., Harris, T., Nixon, T., Dickison, D., Murray, C., Towle, B.: Reducing the Knowledge Tracing Space. In: Barnes, Desmarais, Romero, Ventura (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Cordoba, Spain, pp. 151–160 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walonoski, J.A., Heffernan, N.T.: Prevention of off-task gaming behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 722–724. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Winne, P.H., Hadwin, A.F.: Studying as Self-Regulated Learning. In: Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 279–306. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Long, Y., Aleven, V. (2011). Students’ Understanding of Their Student Model. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21868-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21869-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics