Abstract
This article is an answer to the thesis that research in the domain of business process management (BPM) is doing the wrong job, does not deliver results and therefore is responsible for the alleged failure of BPM in the field. We work out that this thesis is not based on any scientific argumentation or proof. Based on the finding that BPM itself does not have a solid scientific foundation we present some thoughts how to come up with a scientific theory of BPM. Additionally we argue that the term BPM has different meanings in different research and application areas. This, logically, leads to different research interests, but all together they give a complex (but fragmented) picture and will emerge towards an unified theory of BPM. The conclusion of this article follows the insight of experts in the domain of BPM research and application, that research in BPM is still not finished and that it is rather at the very beginning. Especially if we understand BPM as one element of sociotechnical systems, which leads us to think about a more holistic approach in the sense of systems theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business process management: A survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
vom Brocke, J., Roesemann, M.: Foreword. In: Handbook on Business Process Management, vol. 1, pp. vii–ix. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Bunge, M.: Philosophy of Science: From Explanation to Justification. Transaction Publ. (1998)
Bunge, M.: Philosophy of Science: From Problem to Theory. Transaction Publ. (1998)
Bunge, M.: The GST Challenge to the Classical Philosophies of Science. In: Scientific Realism: Selected Essays of Mario Bunge, Prometheus Books (2001)
Davenport, T.H.: Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)
Hammer, M.: What is Business Process Management? In: Handbook on Business Process Management, vol. 1, pp. 3–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business (1993)
Hammer, M., Hershman, L.W.: Faster, cheaper, better. Crown Business (2010)
Kohlbacher, M.: The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Business Process Management Journal 16(1), 135–152 (2010)
Kosiol, E.: Organisation der Unternehmung. Gabler (1962)
Nordsieck, F.: Die schaubildliche Erfassung und Untersuchung der Betriebsorganisation. Poeschel (1932)
Nordsieck, F.: Grundlagen der Organisationslehre. Poeschel (1934)
Olbrich, T.J.: Why we need to re-think current BPM research issues. Presentation S-BPM 2010 (2010)
Palmberg, K.: Experiences of implementing process management: a multiple-case study. Business Process Management Journal 16(1), 93–113 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singer, R., Zinser, E. (2011). Business Process Management – Do We Need a New Research Agenda?. In: Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Singer, R., Seese, D. (eds) Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. S-BPM ONE 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 138. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23135-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23135-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23134-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23135-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)