Abstract
Belief merging has been an active research field with many important applications. Many approaches for belief merging have been proposed, but these approaches only take the belief bases as inputs without the adequate attention to the role of agents, who provide the belief bases, thus the results achieved are merely ideal and difficult to apply in the multi-agent systems. In this paper, we present a merging approach based on the negotiation techniques. A new model is proposed in which agents gradually build their common belief base from the beliefs that they provide in each round of negotiation. A set of postulates is also introduced to characterize the logical properties of the merging results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J.: Combining multiple knowledge bases. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 3, 208–220 (1991)
Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Combining knowledge bases consisting of first order theories. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds.) ISMIS 1991. LNCS, vol. 542, pp. 92–101. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34, 217–252 (2002)
Booth, R.: A negotiation-style framework for non-prioritised revision. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2001, pp. 137–150. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2001)
Booth, R.: Social contraction and belief negotiation. Inf. Fusion 7, 19–34 (2006)
Everaere, P., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P.: Conflict-based merging operators. In: KR, pp. 348–357 (2008)
Konieczny, S.: Belief base merging as a game. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(3), 275–294 (2004)
Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Da2 merging operators. Artif. Intell. 157, 49–79 (2004)
Konieczny, S., Pérez, R.P.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework, vol. 12, pp. 773–808 (2002)
Levi, I.: Subjunctives, dispositions and chances. Synthese 34, 423–455 (1977)
Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Arbitration (or how to merge knowledge bases). IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 10, 76–90 (1998)
Lin, J.: Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artif. Intell. 83, 363–378 (1996)
Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A.: Merging stratified knowledge bases under constraints. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 281–286. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)
Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of arbitration. International Journal of Algebra and Computation 7, 133–160 (1995)
Zhang, D.: A logic-based axiomatic model of bargaining. Artif. Intell. 174, 1307–1322 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tran, T.H., Vo, Q.B., Kowalczyk, R. (2011). Merging Belief Bases by Negotiation. In: König, A., Dengel, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kise, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6881. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23851-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23851-2_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23850-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23851-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)