Abstract
In recent years, Enterprise Architecture has gradually emerged as the preeminent means to change and transform large organizations. By employing Architectural Principles, organizations strive to master the complexity inherent in business processes and IT system and their harmonious alignment. Unfortunately, very rarely has the coevolutionary and emergent nature of alignment been taken into consideration in IS research. Even if different approaches focus on business IT alignment, most of them have a tendency to focus on alignment as a state or an outcome. In this paper we argue that a dynamic approach is necessary in order to achieve business IT alignment in a long-term perspective. Furthermore we demonstrate that the choice of architectural principles has an impact on the ability to achieve and maintain operational as well as structural alignment. A case study is used as a basis for the analysis. The conclusion is that an Enterprise-centric architecture can create freedom of action for dynamic operational alignment, and that Business-oriented IT management can keep the IS Architecture aligned with the Business Architecture in a long term perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts, A.T.M., Goossenaerts, J.B.M., Hammer, D.K., Wortmann, J.C.: Architectures in context: on the evolution of business, application software, and ICT platform architectures. Information & Management 41, 781–794 (2004)
Benbya, H., McKelvey, B.: Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to imrpove IS alignment: a multi-level approach. Journal of Information Technology (21), 284–298 (2006)
Chan, Y.E.: Why haven’t we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive 1(2) (June 2002)
Mathiassen, L.: Collaborative Practice Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (14), 57–76 (2002)
Walsham, G.: Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method. European Journal of Information Systems (4), 74–81 (1995)
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–94 (1999)
Beimborn, D., Franke, J., Wagner, H.-T., Weitzel, T.: The Impact of Operational Alignment on IT Flexibility – Empirical Evidence from a Survey in the German Banking Industry. In: Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems. Paper 131 (2007)
Wagner, H.-T., Weitel, T.: Operational IT Business Alignment as the Missing Link from IT Strategy to Firm Success. In: Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems. Paper 74 (2006)
Hugoson, M.-Å., Magoulas, T., Pessi, K.: Interoperability Strategies for Business Agility. In: Dietz, J.L.G., et al. (eds.) CIAO! 2008 and EOMAS 2008. LNBIP, vol. 10, pp. 108–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Allen, B.R., Och Boynton, A.C.: Information Architecture: In Search of Efficient Flexibility. MIS Quarterly 15(4) (December 1991)
Solotruk, M., Kristofic, M.: Increasing the Degree of Information System Integration and Developing an Integrated Information System. Information & Management 3(3) (1980)
Hugoson, M.-Å., Magoulas, T., Pessi, K.: Architectural principles for alignment within the context of agile enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation (2009)
Hendersson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 36(2&3) (1999)
Reich, B.H., Benbasat, I.: Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly 20(1), 55–81 (1996)
Reich, B.H., Benbasat, I.: Measuring the Information Systems - Business Strategy Relationship. In: Leidner, D.E., Galliers, R.D. (eds.) Strategic Information Management: Challenges and Strategies in Managing Information Systems, pp. 265–310. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2003)
Maes, R., Rijsenrij, D., Truijens, O., Goedvolk, H.: Redefining business IT alignment through a unified framework. PrimaVera Working Paper 2000-19. Universiteit van Amsterdam (2000)
van de Ven, A.H., Scott Poole, M.: Explaining Development and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 20(3), 510–540 (1995)
Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1), 1–34 (1997)
Bartunek, J.M., Moch, M.K.: First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 23(4) (1987)
Davenport, T.H.: Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System. Harvard Business Review (July-August 1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hugoson, MÅ., Pessi, K. (2011). Operational and Structural Business IT Alignment. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 97. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25370-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25370-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25369-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25370-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)