Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Stability of Model-Mediated Teleoperation: Discussion and Experiments

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication (EuroHaptics 2012)

Abstract

The design of a bilateral teleoperation system remains challenging in cases with high-impedance slave robots or substantial communication delays. Especially for these scenarios, model-mediated teleoperation offers a promising new approach. In this paper, we present a first stability discussion. We examine the continuous behavior using general control principles and discuss how the model structure and its predictive power affects system lag and stability. We also recognize the unavoidability of discrete model jumps and discuss measures to isolate events and prevent limit cycles. The discussions are illustrated in a single degree of freedom case and supported by single degree of freedom experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niemeyer, G., Slotine, J.-J.E.: Stable adaptive teleoperation. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 16, 152–162 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel, R.W., McAree, P.R.: Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 17(8), 811–830 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Willaert, B., Corteville, B., Reynaerts, D., Van Brussel, H., Vander Poorten, E.B.: A mechatronic analysis of the classical position-force controller based on bounded environment passivity. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 30(4), 444–463 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hannaford, B., Ryu, J.: Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1863–1869 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Love, L.J., Book, W.J.: Force reflecting teleoperation with adaptive impedance control. Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Part B) 34(1), 159–165 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ryu, D., Song, J.-B., Choi, J., Kang, S., Kim, M.: Frequency domain stability observer and active damping control for stable haptic interaction. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 105–110 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hannaford, B.: A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5(4), 426–434 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitra, P., Niemeyer, G.: Model-mediated telemanipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research 27(2), 253–262 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., Salcudean, S.E.: Adaptive transparent impedance reflecting teleoperation. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 1369–1374 (April 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Achhammer, A., Weber, C., Peer, A., Buss, M.: Improvement of model-mediated teleoperation using a new hybrid environment estimation technique. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5358–5363 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tzafestas, C., Velanas, S., Fakiridis, G.: Adaptive impedance control in haptic teleoperation to improve transparency under time-delay. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 212–219 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Willaert, B., Goethals, P., Reynaerts, D., Van Brussel, H., Vander Poorten, E.: Transparent and Shaped Stiffness Reflection for Telesurgery. In: Advances in Haptics, ch. 13, pp. 259–282. IN-TECH (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park, J.: Improving Teleoperation by using models and tasks. PhD thesis, University of Stanford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Newman, W.S.: Stability and performance limits of interactions controllers. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 114(4), 563–570 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitra, P., Gentry, D., Niemeyer, G.: User preferences and performance in model mediated telemanipulation. In: World Haptics Conf., pp. 268–273 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Willaert, B., Van Brussel, H., Niemeyer, G. (2012). Stability of Model-Mediated Teleoperation: Discussion and Experiments. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7282. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31401-8_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31401-8_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31400-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31401-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics