Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Differential Privacy in Tripartite Interaction: A Case Study with Linguistic Minorities in Canada

  • Conference paper
Data Privacy Management and Autonomous Spontaneous Security (DPM 2012, SETOP 2012)

Abstract

This paper relates our venture to solve a real-world problem about official language minorities in Canada. The goal was to enable a form of linkage between health data (hosted at ICES – a provincial agency) and language data from the 2006 census (hosted at Statistics Canada – a federal agency) despite a seemingly impossible set of legal constraints. The long-term goal for health researchers is to understand health data according to the linguistic variable, shown to be a health determinant. We first suggested a pattern of tripartite interaction that, by design, prevents collection of residual information by a potential adversary. The suggestion was quickly set aside by Statistics Canada based on the risk of collusion an adversary could exploit among these entities. Our second suggestion was more involved; it consisted in adapting differential privacy mechanisms to the tripartite scheme so as to control the level of leakage in case of collusion. While not being rejected and even receiving enthousiastic interest per se, the solution was considered an option only if other simpler (but also less promising) alternatives are first, and methodically ruled out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Houle, C., Berthelot, J.M., David, P., Wolfson, M.C., Mustard, C., Roos, L.: Matching census database and Manitoba health care files. In: Proc. of International Workshop on Record Linkage Techniques, p. 305. National Academies (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Statistics Canada Website. Policy on record linkage (fetched September 2010), http://www.statcan.gc.ca/record-enregistrement/policy4-1-politique4-1-eng.html

  3. Casteigts, A., Chomienne, M.-H., Bouchard, L., Jourdan, G.-V.: Enabling Dynamic Linkage of Linguistic Census Data at Statistics Canada. Institut de Recherche de l’Hôpital Montfort, Technical report (March 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., Smith, A.: Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 265–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Nissim, K., Raskhodnikova, S., Smith, A.: Smooth sensitivity and sampling in private data analysis. In: Proc. of 39th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 75–84 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dwork, C.: Ask a Better Question, Get a Better Answer – A New Approach to Private Data Analysis. In: Schwentick, T., Suciu, D. (eds.) ICDT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4353, pp. 18–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dwork, C., Nissim, K.: Privacy-Preserving Datamining on Vertically Partitioned Databases. In: Franklin, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152, pp. 528–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blum, A., Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K.: Practical privacy: the SuLQ framework. In: Proc. of ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pp. 128–138 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hardt, M., Talwar, K.: On the geometry of differential privacy. In: Proc. of the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 705–714 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, A.: Privacy-preserving statistical estimation with optimal convergence rates. In: Proc. of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 813–822 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kifer, D., Machanavajjhala, A.: No free lunch in data privacy. In: Proc. of the 2011 Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 193–204 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Privacy at ICES (fetched March 2011), http://ices.queensu.ca/privacy.html

  13. Stolfo, S.J., Tsudik, G. (eds.): IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine, SI on Privacy-Preserving Sharing of Sensitive Information. IEEE Computer Society (July-August 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Casteigts, A., Chomienne, MH., Bouchard, L., Jourdan, GV. (2013). Differential Privacy in Tripartite Interaction: A Case Study with Linguistic Minorities in Canada. In: Di Pietro, R., Herranz, J., Damiani, E., State, R. (eds) Data Privacy Management and Autonomous Spontaneous Security. DPM SETOP 2012 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7731. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35890-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35890-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35889-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35890-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics