Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

An Extension of Fault Sensitivity Analysis Based on Clockwise Collision

  • Conference paper
Information Security and Cryptology (Inscrypt 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7763))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper proposes an extension of fault sensitivity analysis based on clockwise collision. The original FSA attack uses the fault injections to exploit the sensitivity of calculations against the fault injections. While the clockwise collision fault sensitivity analysis (CC-FSA) uses the fault injections to detect the occurrence of the clockwise collision and to recover the secret key. Clockwise collision is a phenomenon for iterative hardware circuits, which leads to nearly impossible setup-time violations. Take an AES S-box as an instance, clockwise collision occurs when the S-box inputs for two consecutive clock cycles are identical in value. As a result, the combinational circuit in the second clock cycle has almost no signal toggle and a negligible critical path delay. This paper proposes and verifies the concept of CC-FSA using the clock-glitch-based fault injections and an unprotected AES implementation. We investigate the key recovery method for CC-FSA with a noisy data set and we consider CC-FSA can help the previous collision-based model-less FSA attack to identify the final 8-bit secret information without additional data and negligible computational overhead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biham, E., Shamir, A.: Differential Fault Analysis of Secret Key Cryptosystems. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 513–525. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Boneh, D., DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J.: On the Importance of Checking Cryptographic Protocols for Faults (Extended Abstract). In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandolfi, K., Mourtel, C., Olivier, F.: Electromagnetic Analysis: Concrete Results. In: Koç, Ç.K., Naccache, D., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2162, pp. 251–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Kocher, P.C., Jaffe, J., Jun, B.: Differential Power Analysis. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 388–397. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Y., Ohta, K., Sakiyama, K.: New Fault-Based Side-Channel Attack Using Fault Sensitivity. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 7(1), 88–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Y., Sakiyama, K., Gomisawa, S., Fukunaga, T., Takahashi, J., Ohta, K.: Fault Sensitivity Analysis. In: Mangard, Standaert (eds.) [7], pp. 320–334

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mangard, S., Standaert, F.-X. (eds.): CHES 2010. LNCS, vol. 6225. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Moradi, A., Mischke, O., Eisenbarth, T.: Correlation-Enhanced Power Analysis Collision Attack. In: Mangard, Standaert (eds.) [7], pp. 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moradi, A., Mischke, O., Paar, C., Li, Y., Ohta, K., Sakiyama, K.: On the Power of Fault Sensitivity Analysis and Collision Side-Channel Attacks in a Combined Setting. In: Preneel, B., Takagi, T. (eds.) CHES 2011. LNCS, vol. 6917, pp. 292–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Morioka, S., Satoh, A.: An Optimized S-Box Circuit Architecture for Low Power AES Design. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2523, pp. 172–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Encryption Standard. NIST FIPS PUB 197 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piret, G., Quisquater, J.-J.: A Differential Fault Attack Technique against SPN Structures, with Application to the AES and KHAZAD. In: Walter, C.D., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2003. LNCS, vol. 2779, pp. 77–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Quisquater, J.-J., Samyde, D.: ElectroMagnetic Analysis (EMA): Measures and Counter-Measures for Smart Cards. In: Attali, I., Jensen, T. (eds.) E-smart 2001. LNCS, vol. 2140, pp. 200–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Research Center for Information Security (RCIS). Side-channel attack standard evaluation board (SASEBO), http://www.rcis.aist.go.jp/special/SASEBO/CryptoLSI-en.html

  15. Robisson, B., Manet, P.: Differential Behavioral Analysis. In: Paillier, P., Verbauwhede, I. (eds.) CHES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4727, pp. 413–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakiyama, K., Li, Y., Iwamoto, M., Ohta, K.: Information-Theoretic Approach to Optimal Differential Fault Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 7(1), 109–120 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Satoh, A., Morioka, S., Takano, K., Munetoh, S.: A Compact Rijndael Hardware Architecture with S-Box Optimization. In: Boyd, C. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2248, pp. 239–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Selmane, N., Guilley, S., Danger, J.-L.: Practical Setup Time Violation Attacks on AES. In: EDCC, pp. 91–96. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yen, S.-M., Joye, M.: Checking Before Output Not Be Enough Against Fault-Based Cryptanalysis. IEEE Trans. Computers 49(9), 967–970 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, Y., Ohta, K., Sakiyama, K. (2013). An Extension of Fault Sensitivity Analysis Based on Clockwise Collision. In: Kutyłowski, M., Yung, M. (eds) Information Security and Cryptology. Inscrypt 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7763. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38519-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38519-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38518-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38519-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics