Abstract
Dwyer et al. define a language to specify dynamic properties based on predefined patterns and scopes. To define a property, the user has to choose a pattern and a scope among a limited number of them. Dwyer et al. define the semantics of these properties by translating each composition of a pattern and a scope into usual temporal logics (LTL, CTL, etc.). First, this translational semantics is not compositional and thus not easily extensible to other patterns/scopes. Second, it is not always faithful to the natural semantics of the informal definitions.
In this paper, we propose a compositional automata-based approach defining the semantics of each pattern and each scope by an automaton. Then, we propose a composition operation in such a way that the property semantics is defined by composing the automata. Hence, the semantics is compositional and easily extensible as we show it by handling many extensions to the Dwyer et al.’s language. We compare our compositional semantics with the Dwyer et al.’s translational semantics by checking whether our automata are equivalent to the Büchi automata of the LTL expressions given by Dwyer et al. In some cases, our semantics reveals a lack of homogeneity within Dwyer et al.’s semantics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cabrera Castillos, K., Dadeau, F., Julliand, J., Taha, S.: Projet TASCCC, Test Automatique basé sur des SCénarios et évaluation Critères Communs., http://lifc.univ-fcomte.fr/TASCCC/
Cabrera Castillos, K., Dadeau, F., Julliand, J., Taha, S.: Measuring test properties coverage for evaluating UML/OCL model-based tests. In: Wolff, B., Zaïdi, F. (eds.) ICTSS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7019, pp. 32–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Dwyer, M.B., Alavi, H., Avrunin, G., Corbett, J., Dillon, L., Pasareanu, C.: Specification Patterns, http://patterns.projects.cis.ksu.edu/
Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 411–420 (1999)
Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Property specification patterns for finite-state verification. In: FMSP, pp. 7–15 (1998)
Gastin, P., Oddoux, D.: Fast LTL to Büchi automata translation. In: Berry, G., Comon, H., Finkel, A. (eds.) CAV 2001. LNCS, vol. 2102, pp. 53–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Gerth, R., Peled, D., Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Simple on-the-fly automatic verification of linear temporal logic. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth IFIP WG6.1 International Symposium on Protocol Specification, Testing and Verification XV, pp. 3–18. Chapman, Hall, Ltd., London (1996)
Markey, N.: Temporal logic with past is exponentially more succinct, concurrency column. Bulletin of the EATCS 79, 122–128 (2003)
Sistla, A.P., Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: The complementation problem for Büchi automata with applications to temporal logic. Theoretical Computer Science 49(2-3), 217–237 (1987)
Taha, S.: OCL temporal extension (2012), http://wwwdi.supelec.fr/taha/temporalocl/
Tsay, Y.K., et al.: Graphical Tool for Omega-Automata and Logics, http://goal.im.ntu.edu.tw/wiki/doku.php
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Castillos, K.C., Dadeau, F., Julliand, J., Kanso, B., Taha, S. (2013). A Compositional Automata-Based Semantics for Property Patterns. In: Johnsen, E.B., Petre, L. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7940. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38613-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38613-8_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38612-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38613-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)