Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Two-Component Opinion Dynamics Theory of Official Stance and Real Opinion Including Self-Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision Technologies (IDT 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 193))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 490 Accesses

Abstract

We extend the theory of opinion dynamics, which introduces trust and distrust in human relationships in society, to multiple components. The theory is made up of N components, and in particular, here, two components are treated. In this paper, we show the calculation for real opinion and official stance as the two components of opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuran, T.: Sparks and prairieres: a theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice, vol. 61(1), pp. 41–74 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ye, M., Qin, Y., Govaert, A., Anderson, B.D.O., Cao, M.: An inuence network model to study discrepancies in expressed and private opinions. Automatica 107, 371–381 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedkin, N.E.: Scale-free interpersonal inuences on opinions in complex systems. J. Math. Sociol. 39(3), 168–173 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sîrbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V.D.P., Tria, F.: Opinion dynamics: models, extensions and external effects. In: Loreto, V., et al. (eds.) Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Understanding Complex Systems, pp. 363–401. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Galam, S.: Rational group decision making: a random field Ising model at T = 0. Phys. A 238, 66 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sznajd-Weron, M.: Tabiszewski, and A. M. Timpanaro: Europhys. Lett. 96, 48002 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galam, S.: Application of statistical physics to politics. Physica A 274, 132–139 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Galam, S.: Real space renormalization group and totalitarian paradox of majority rule voting. Physica A 285, 66–76 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Galam S: Are referendums a mechanism to turn our prejudices into rational choices? An unfortunate answer from sociophysics. Laurence Morel and Matt Qvortrup (eds.), Chapter 19 of The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy Taylor & Francis, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galam, S.: The Trump phenomenon: an explanation from sociophysics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 31, 1742015 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.-P.: Meet, discuss and segregate! Complexity 7, 55–63 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hegselmann, R, Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jager, W., Amblard, F.: Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change. Computat. Math. Organ. Theory 10, 295–303 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jager, W., Amblard, F.: Multiple attitude dynamics in large populations. In: Presented in the Agent 2005 Conference on Generative Social Processes, Models and Mechanisms, 13–15 October 2005 at The University of Chicago (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurmyshev, E., Juárez, H.A., González-Silva, R.A.: Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: concord against partila antagonism. Phys. A 390, 2945–2955 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y.: Opinion dynamics theory for analysis of consensus formation and division of opinion on the internet. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems (IES2018), pp. 71–76 (2018). arXiv:1812.11845 [physics.soc-ph]

  19. Ishii, A.: Opinion dynamics theory considering trust and suspicion in human relations. In: Morais, D., Carreras A., de Almeida A., Vetschera R. (eds.) Group Decision and Negotiation: Behavior, Models, and Support. GDN 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 351, pp. 193–204. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y. (2009) Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of trust and distrust and media effects. In: The 33rd Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33 (JSAI2019 2F3-OS-5a-05) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Okano, N., Ishii, A.: Isolated, untrusted people in society and charismatic person using opinion dynamics. In: Proceedings of ABCSS2019 in Web Intelligence, pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y: New Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of both trust and distrust. In: Proceedings of ABCSS2019 in Web Intelligence, pp. 43–50 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Okano, N., Ishii, A.: Sociophysics approach of simulation of charismatic person and distrusted people in society using opinion dynamics. In: Sato, H., Iwanaga, S., Ishii, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd Asia-Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, pp. 238–252. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ishii, A., Okano, N.: Two-dimensional opinion dynamics of real opinion and official stance. In: Proceedings of NetSci-X 2020: Sixth International Winter School and Conference on Network Science, Springer Proceedings in Complexity, pp. 139–153 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levenson, J.L. (ed.): Romeo and Juliet. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000). ISBN: 0-19-281496-6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Asch, S.E.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: Groups, Leadership and Men; Research in Human Relations, pp. 177–190. Carnegie Press, Oxford (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, S.W., Huang, C.Y., Sun, C.T.: Modeling self-perception agents in an opinion dynamics propagation society. Simulation 90, 238–248 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, C.-Y., Wen, T.-H.: A novel private attitude and public opinion dynamics model for simulating pluralistic ignorance and minority influence. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17, 8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. León-Medina, F.J., Tena-Sànchez, J.M., Miguel, F.J.: Fakers becoming believers: how opinion dynamics are shaped by preference falsification, impression management and coherence heuristics. Qual. Quant. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00909-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K04881. The authors thank for the meaningful discussion on the two-dimensional opinion dynamics of official stance and real opinion with Prof. S Galam of CEVIPOF-Centre for Political Research, Sciences Po and CNRS, Paris, France, Prof. H.Yamamoto of Rissho University and Prof. H. Takikawa of Tohoku University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tottori University, Koyama, Tottori, 680-8552, Japan

    Nozomi Okano, Yuki Ohira & Akira Ishii

Authors
  1. Nozomi Okano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuki Ohira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akira Ishii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Ishii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

    Ireneusz Czarnowski

  2. KES International Research, UK

    Robert J. Howlett

  3. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Centre for Artificial Intelligence, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Okano, N., Ohira, Y., Ishii, A. (2020). Two-Component Opinion Dynamics Theory of Official Stance and Real Opinion Including Self-Interaction. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. IDT 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 193. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5925-9_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation