Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Various Personal Cloud Storage Services for Healthcare Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cyber Intelligence and Information Retrieval

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 291))

  • 972 Accesses

Abstract

In recent times, usage of personal cloud storage services for storing e-health records in on a rise. This is due to the constant accessibility, easy sharing, and safe storage of the data at a nominal cost. In this paper, we have analyzed the performance of four personal cloud storage services: Google Drive, Dropbox, Sync.com, and Icedrive using medical image data files of various sizes. The parameters checked were number of packets transmitted during file upload and duration of time to upload, download, and delete the files. The results show us a comparative analysis of the personal cloud storage services based on the parameters and also help us identify certain gaps for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gracia-Tinedo R, Artigas MS, Moreno-Martínez A, Cotes C, López PG (2013) Actively measuring personal cloud storage. In: 2013 IEEE sixth international conference on cloud computing, Santa Clara, CA, pp 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2013.25

  2. Na S, Park J, Huh E (2010) Personal cloud computing security framework. In:2010 IEEE Asia-Pacific services computing conference, Hangzhou, pp 671-675. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSCC.2010.117

  3. Gracia-Tinedo R, Artigas MS, López PG (2013) Cloud-as-a-Gift: effectively exploiting personal cloud free accounts via REST APIs. In: 2013 IEEE sixth international conference on cloud computing, Santa Clara, CA, pp 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2013.47

  4. Karel V, DeMoor K, Lieven M (2013) Use-and QoE-related aspects of personal cloud applications: an exploratory survey. 36–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2013.6603202

  5. Quick D, Raymond Choo K-K (2014) Google drive: forensic analysis of data remnants. J Netw Comput Appl 40:179–193. ISSN 1084–8045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.09.016

  6. Akter M, Gani A, Rahman Md, Hassan M, Almogren A, Ahmad S (2018) Performance analysis of personal cloud storage services for mobile multimedia health record management. IEEE Access 6:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. https://businessquant.com/dropboxs-paying-users-growth

  8. Das N, Basu S, Bit SD (2020) Efficient dropbox deployment toward improving post-disaster information exchange in a smart city. <i>ACM Trans Spatial Algor Syst</i> 6, 2, 9:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373645

  9. Idilio D, Mellia M, Munafo MM, Sperotto A, Sadre R, Pras A (2012) Inside dropbox: understanding personal cloud storage services. In: Proceedings of the 2012 internet measurement conference, pp 481–494

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhat WA, Jalal MF, Khan SS, Shah FF, Wani MA (2019) Forensic analysis of Sync. com and flipdrive cloud applications on android platform. Forensic Sci Int 302:109845

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levin SP, Levin M (2019) Managing ideas, people, and projects: organizational tools and strategies for researchers. Iscience 20:278–291

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ilieva G, Yankova T, Hadjieva V, Doneva R, Totkov G (2020) Cloud service selection as a fuzzy multi-criteria problem. TEM J 9(2):484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikos LF (2019) Knowledge representation to support partially automated honeypot analysis based on Wireshark packet capture files. In: Intelligent decision technologies, Springer, Singapore, pp 345–351

    Google Scholar 

  14. HyunHo K, Lee HJ, Lim HT (2020) Performance of packet analysis between observer and wireshark. In: 2020 22nd International conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT), IEEE, pp 268–271

    Google Scholar 

  15. https://github.com/ieee8023/covid-chestxray-dataset

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roy, M., Singh, M. (2022). Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Various Personal Cloud Storage Services for Healthcare Images. In: Tavares, J.M.R.S., Dutta, P., Dutta, S., Samanta, D. (eds) Cyber Intelligence and Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 291. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4284-5_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics