Abstract
With the continuous advances in AI, the vision of fully automated driving is not far away. However, it remains a key challenge to understand what kind of multi-agent systems will these intelligent cars shape, when being deployed on the road. This paper examines a key question of societal importance along this line. That is, will each self-driving car’s intelligent/selfish behavior lead to unfair societal outcomes and, if so, how could we mitigate such unfairness.
Specifically, we envision the future with a highly automated traffic network where all cars are automated and scheduled by a central planner. We start by observing that in single-round routing, the objective of social cost minimization may be inherently incompatible with fairness—that is, any truly fair routing has been unfortunately far from social optimum which can be achieved only by “sacrificing” a portion of the population to significantly profit the other. To address this fundamental challenge, we extend the scope of the mode to multi-round repeated routing. We develop two methods to compute the social cost minimizing routing with fairness considerations: (i) an integer program optimization approach, which we show can be approximately solved via continuous relaxation, (ii) travel probability approximation, which can be complicated into a more generalized solution. Numerical experiments show that we are able to achieve socially optimal routing while restoring fairness.
The authors would like to thank Prof. Haifeng Xu from the University of Chicago for his research guidance throughout this project, insightful comments and helpful suggestions while drafting and revising the paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
To see this, we observe that any configuration of the decentralized routing choice by each individual is a feasible choice for the central planner as well, but self-interested individual choices may lead to sub-optimal overall configuration (see, e.g., [10]) whereas a central planner can escape such sub-optimality via global optimization.
References
Ackermann, K.A., Murphy, R.O.: Explaining cooperative behavior in public goods games: how preferences and beliefs affect contribution levels. Games 10(1), 15 (2019)
Angelelli, E., Morandi, V., Speranza, M.G.: Minimizing the total travel time with limited unfairness in traffic networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 123, 105016 (2020)
Avineri, E.: Social value orientation and the efficiency of traffic networks. In: The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research, pp. 725–743 (2009)
Chin, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Balakrishnan, H., Egorov, M., Evans, A.: Efficient and fair traffic flow management for on-demand air mobility. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 13, 359–369 (2022)
Eikenbroek, O.A., Still, G.J., Van Berkum, E.C.: Improving the performance of a traffic system by fair rerouting of travelers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 299(1), 195–207 (2022)
Hamdan, A., Hamdan, S., Benbitour, M.H., Jradi, S.: On the fair scheduling of truck drivers in delivery companies: balancing fairness and profit. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1–26 (2024)
Jalota, D., Solovey, K., Tsao, M., Zoepf, S., Pavone, M.: Balancing fairness and efficiency in traffic routing via interpolated traffic assignment. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 37(2), 32 (2023)
Moulin, H.: Fair Division and Collective Welfare. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Nair, D.J., Rey, D., Dixit, V.V.: Fair allocation and cost-effective routing models for food rescue and redistribution. IISE Trans. 49(12), 1172–1188 (2017)
Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É.: How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (JACM) 49(2), 236–259 (2002)
Zhang, L., Khalgui, M., Li, Z., Zhang, Y.: Fairness concern-based coordinated vehicle route guidance using an asymmetrical congestion game. IET Intel. Transport Syst. 16(9), 1236–1248 (2022)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wei, S., Peng, Y. (2024). Time Heals Unfairness: Efficient Dynamic Routing at an Autonomous Society. In: Fujita, H., Cimler, R., Hernandez-Matamoros, A., Ali, M. (eds) Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Theory and Applications. IEA/AIE 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14748. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4677-4_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4677-4_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-4676-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-4677-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)