Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Concept-Level Interpretable SOM for Visual Analysis of High-Dimensional Non-dominated Solution Set

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Intelligent Computing Technology and Applications (ICIC 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14862))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization problems will generate a solution set consisting of many non-dominated solutions, and the determination of the final decision needs to be based on the understanding and analysis of the non-dominated solution set. Visual analysis methods can provide the most intuitive explanations, but existing visualization methods rarely deal with high-dimensional complex real-world problems and rarely consider providing conceptual-level explanations for humans. To analyze the non-dominated solution set from the conceptual level, this paper proposes a concept-level visualization method based on an interpretable Self-Organizing Map (iSOM). Firstly, the mapping table between decision variables and concepts is constructed and divided into two types of concepts, algebraic-type and set-type. Then the conceptual data plane (C-plane) for displaying algebraic-type concepts is proposed to avoid the errors associated with the approximation of the iSOM component plane, and the conceptual set matrix (C-matrix) is proposed for visualizing and analyzing set-type data by iSOM. In addition, this paper achieves effective clustering visualization of the objective function component plane and integrates real data distributions into iSOM, providing a more informative and intuitive visualization method. Finally, the proposed concept-level visualization approach is demonstrated by constructing a real-world multi-objective multi-vehicle rescue supplies distribution problem. By taking the visualization of nondominated solution sets to the conceptual level, new insights are provided for reliable decision-making in real multi-objective optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alsouly, H., Kirley, M., Munoz, M.A.: An instance space analysis of constrained multi-objective optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 27(5), 1427–1439 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blank, J., Deb, K.: Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access 8, 89497–89509 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coello Coello, C.: Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 1(1), 28–36 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dy, B., Ibrahim, N., Poorthuis, A., Joyce, S.: Improving visualization design for effective multi-objective decision making. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 28(10), 3405–3416 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng, J.R., mei Gai, W., ying Li, J.: Multi-objective optimization of rescue station selection for emergency logistics management. Saf. Sci. 120, 276–282 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, Y., Zhang, Z., Jiao, A., Ma, Y., Cheng, R.: A comparative visual analytics framework for evaluating evolutionary processes in multi-objective optimization (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, M., Zhen, L., Yao, X.: How to read many-objective solution sets in parallel coordinates [educational forum]. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 12(4), 88–100 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, Z., Wang, Y.: Evolutionary constrained multiobjective optimization: test suite construction and performance comparisons. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 23(6), 972–986 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagar, D., Pannerselvam, K., Ramu, P.: A novel data-driven visualization of n-dimensional feasible region using interpretable self-organizing maps (iSOM). Neural Netw. 155, 398–412 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagar, D., Ramu, P., Deb, K.: Visualization and analysis of pareto-optimal fronts using interpretable self-organizing map (iSOM). Swarm Evol. Comput. 76, 101202 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan, J.S., Liang, Q., Chu, S.C., Tseng, K.K., Watada, J.: A multi-strategy surrogate-assisted competitive swarm optimizer for expensive optimization problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 147, 110733 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pryke, A., Mostaghim, S., Nazemi, A.: Heatmap visualization of population based multi objective algorithms. In: EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 361–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70928-2_29

  13. Qian, H., Yu, Y.: Solving high-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems with low effective dimensions. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 31(1) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schapermeier, L., Grimme, C., Kerschke, P.: Plotting impossible? Surveying visualization methods for continuous multi-objective benchmark problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 26(6), 1306–1320 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Talukder, A.K.A., Deb, K.: A topologically consistent visualization of high dimensional pareto-front for multi-criteria decision making. In: 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1579–1586 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thole, S.P., Ramu, P.: Design space exploration and optimization using self-organizing maps. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 62(3), 1071–1088 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallender, S.S.: Calculation of the wasserstein distance between probability distributions on the line. Theory Probab. Appl. 18(4), 784–786 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vatanen, T., et al.: Self-organization and missing values in SOM and GTM. Neurocomputing 147, 60–70 (2015). Advances in Self-organizing Maps Subtitle of the special issue: Selected Papers from the Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps 2012 (WSOM 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wattenberg, M., Viegas, F., Johnson, I.: How to use t-SNE effectively. Distill. 1(10), e2 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Chuan Chu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Song, PC., Pan, JS., Sun, Xx., Chu, SC. (2024). Concept-Level Interpretable SOM for Visual Analysis of High-Dimensional Non-dominated Solution Set. In: Huang, DS., Zhang, X., Chen, W. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Computing Technology and Applications. ICIC 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14862. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5578-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5578-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-5577-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-5578-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics