Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Literature Review of Educational Robotics and Early Childhood Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technological Innovations in Education

Abstract

Educational robotics is an emerging field with school aged children; however, it is relatively new to the field of early childhood education and care. This means that the use of educational robotics to help support and develop learning with young children has not been researched extensively. As such, teachers may push back on the use of educational robotics in the classroom or may not have the skills to support the learning of young children. There is a growing need to understand current research around educational robotics and early childhood education, especially in prior to school settings (children aged birth to five years). Across the literature however, little attention has been given to acknowledging the use of educational robotics in early childhood education, especially given the difference of the early childhood education context compared to formal schooling. This article draws together the brief research literature that is available to provide an international snapshot of current trends for educational robotics in early childhood education and care settings by answering the question—what are the current trends in research for educational robotics and early childhood education and care. The findings from the review have the potential to provide a reflection of educational robotics while also prompting ways forward for the development of computational thinking with young children. Key messages are given for working with the very youngest of children to ensure that they are also supported when we talk about educational robotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel-Fernandez, J. M., & Vincze, M. (2018). Towards a definition of educational robotics. Proceedings of the Austrian Robotics Workshop 2018 Austrian Robotics Workshop 2018, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. (2019). Coding as another language: A pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education., 6, 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainin, E., Shamir, A., & Eden, S. (2021). Robot programming intervention for promoting spatial relations, mental rotation and visual memory of kindergarten children. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1858464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çiftci, S., & Bildiren, A. (2020). The effect of coding courses on the cognitive abilities and problem- solving skills of preschool children. Computer Science Education, 30(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1696169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Resnick, L. B., & RosĂ©, C. P. (2015). Dialogic instruction: A new frontier (3rd ed., pp. 378–389). Handbook of Educational Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke-Midura, J., D Silvis, D., Shumway, J. F., Lee, V. R., & Kozlowski, J. S. (2021). Developing a kindergarten computational thinking assessment using evidence-centered design: The case of algorithmic thinking. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1877988

  • Clarke-Midura, J., Lee, V. R., Shumway, J. F., & Hamilton, M. M. (2019). The building blocks of coding: A comparison of early childhood coding toys. Information and Learning Science, 120(7), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critten, V., Hagon, H., & Messer, D. (2022). Can pre-school children learn programming and coding through guided play activities? A case study in computational thinking. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(6), 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01236-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridberg, W., & Redfors, A. (2021). Teachers’ and children’s use of words during early Childhood STEM teaching supported by robotics. International Journal of Early Years Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1892599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, E., & West, R. E. (2020). Designing computational thinking and coding badges for early childhood educators. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 64(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00420-3

  • Jesson, J. K., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaloti-Hallak, F., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). Students’ attitudes and motivation during robotics activities. Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015). A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education? 2015 IEEE international workshop on Advanced robotics and its social impacts (ARSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, T., & Sterling, L. (2016). This little-known pioneering educator put coding in the classroom. Retrieved 29 September 2022, from https://theconversation.com/this-little-known-pioneering-educator-put-coding-in-the-classroom-63971

  • Levy, R. B.-B., & Ben-Ari, M. M. (2015). Robotics activities–Is the investment worthwhile? International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Howe, C. (2010). Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, K. W., Kim, H. J., & Lee, S. (2019). Connecting plans to action: The effects of a card-coded robotics curriculum and activities on Korean kindergartners. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00438-4

  • Neumann, M. M. (2019). Social robots and young children’s early language and literacy learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00997-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, A., & McGuckin, C. (2016). The systematic literature review method: Trials and Tribulations of electronic database searching at doctoral level. In SAGE research methods. Cases. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144627305015595381

  • Otterborn, A., Schönborn, K. J., & HultĂ©n, M. (2020). Investigating preschool educators’ implementation of computer programming in their teaching practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00976-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms, children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. In D. Preiss & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163–194). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., & Cesaretti, L. (2019). Towards a definition of educational robotics: a classification of tools, experiences and assessments. In Smart learning with educational robotics (pp. 63–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_3

  • Turan, S., & AydoÄźdu, F. (2020). Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4353–4363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10178-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. X., Choi, Y., Benson, K., Eggleston, C., & Weber, D. (2021a). Teacher’s role in fostering preschoolers’ computational thinking: An exploratory case study, Early Education and Development, 32(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1759012

  • Wang, X., Yin, N., & Zhang, Z. (2021b). Smart design of intelligent companion toys for preschool children. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 35(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060420000499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng, J., & Li, H. (2020). Early technology education in China: A case study of Shanghai. Early Child Development and Care, 190(10), 1574–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1542383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesharim, M. F., & Ben-Ari, M. (2018). Teaching computer science concepts through robotics to elementary school children. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v2i3.30

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Garvis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Year

Authors

Title

Journal

2019

Neumann, Michelle M

Social Robots and Young Children’s Early Language and Literacy Learning

Early Childhood Education Journal

2021

Fridberg, Marie; Redfors, Andreas

Teachers’ and children's use of words during early childhood STEM teaching supported by robotics

International Journal of Early Years Education

2020

Turan, Sedat; AydoÄźdu, Fatih

Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process

Education and Information Technologies

2020

Weng, Jiayi; Li, Hui

Early technology education in China: A case study of Shanghai

Early Child Development and Care

2019

Bers, Marina Umaschi

Coding as another language: a pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood

Journals of Computers in Education

2020

Çiftci, Serdar; Bildiren, Ahmet

The effect of coding courses on the cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills of preschool children

Computer Science Education

2020

Hunsaker, Enoch; West, Richard E

Designing Computational Thinking and Coding Badges for Early Childhood Educators

TechTrends

2020

Otterborn, Anna; Schönborn, Konrad J; Hultén, Magnus

Investigating Preschool Educators’ Implementation of Computer Programming in Their Teaching Practice

Early Childhood Education Journal

2021

Wang, X. Christine; Choi, Youngae; Benson, Keely; Eggleston, Corinne; Weber, Deborah

Teacher's Role in Fostering Preschoolers’ Computational Thinking: An Exploratory Case Study

Early Education and Development

2021

Brainin, Einat;

Shamir, Adina;

Eden, Sigal

Robot programming intervention for promoting spatial relations, mental rotation and visual memory of kindergarten children

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

2021

Wang, Xin;

Yin, Nian;

Zhang, Zhinan

Smart design of intelligent companion toys for preschool children

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing

2019

Clarke-Midura, Jody; Lee, Victor R; Shumway, Jessica F; Hamilton, Megan M

The building blocks of coding: a comparison of early childhood coding toys

Information and Learning Science

2019

Nam, Ki Won;

Kim, Hye Jeong; Lee, Suyoun

Connecting Plans to Action: The Effects of a Card-Coded Robotics Curriculum and Activities on Korean Kindergartners

Asia Pacific Educational Researcher

2021

Clarke-Midura, Jody; Silvis, Deborah; Shumway, Jessica F; Lee, Victor R; Kozlowski, Joseph S

Developing a kindergarten computational thinking assessment using evidence-centered design: the case of algorithmic thinking

Computer Science Education

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garvis, S., Keane, T. (2023). A Literature Review of Educational Robotics and Early Childhood Education. In: Garvis, S., Keane, T. (eds) Technological Innovations in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2785-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2785-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2784-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2785-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics