Abstract
In this chapter we invite the reader to consider the importance of context in the history and evolution of both artificial intelligence and the virtual university. There are histories in the terminology as much as what they refer to. Thus, the virtual universities that emerged late last century are very different in scope and vision compared to contemporary practice. There are likewise different theoretical perspectives with Gartner’s “Hype Cycle,” one among many methods that provides perspective on the stages of AI-driven advances in technological innovation. An imperative to foreground questioning of the domain is what frames our discussion. One key question among many concerns the affordances and challenges that AI presents for a virtual university in the coming decades. A university must prepare for AI-based auditing of the integrity of its student records. AI can help spot plagiarism and fake IDs and support academic integrity. Policy-makers might use AI to spot potentially impossible situations that could give rise to big penalties. But as AI merges into our environment, it is no longer just a tool with new ethical and social issues arising. There already exist forms of colonial biases embedded into AI and machine learning systems. What practical choices exist now? Every virtual university might consider collaborating on how to ensure trustworthiness of their operational systems that use AI. Emerging public policy such as the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act provides a legal mechanism for building a reliable AI ecosystem. Research and innovation into both AI and the kinds of services virtual universities will need into the future are now proliferating. Many futures are possible. From an educational perspective developing human agency through this next era should be a priority. Students could be taught how to use AI-supported tools to solve increasingly challenging questions. Even more imperative will be the questions they ask.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Khzam, F.N., M.M.A. El-Wahab, and N. Yosri. 2020. Graph minors meet machine learning: The power of obstructions. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2006.04689.
Agre, P. 1997. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: Beyond the great divide, ed. G. Bowker, S. Star, L. Gasser, and W. Turner, 131–157. Psychology Press. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315805849
AI HLEG. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI). European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI HLEG). Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation/guidelines.1.html
———. 2020. The assessment list for trustworthy artificial intelligence (ALTAI) for self-assessment. European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI HLEG). Brussels. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/73552fcd-f7c2-11ea-991b-01aa75ed71a1
Ali, S.M. 2016. A brief introduction to decolonial computing. XRDS: Crossroads: The ACM Magazine for Students 22 (4): 16–21.
Arnold, M. 1999. Mainstreaming the digital revolution. Higher Education Quarterly 53 (1): 49–64.
Australian Government. 2019. Artificial intelligence: Solving problems, growing the economy and improving our quality of life. A roadmap for Australia. CSIRO Data 61 Australia. https://data61.csiro.au/en/Our-Research/Our-Work/AI-Roadmap
Brooks, D.C. 2021. EDUCAUSE QuickPoll results: Artificial intelligence use in higher education. EDUCAUSE research notes. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/6/educause-quickpoll-results-artificial-intelligence-use-in-higher-education.
Castells, M. 1998. The rise of the network society. Vol. 1. John Wiley & sons, Oxford, UK.
Champion, T. 2005. Metropole and margin: The dependency theory and the political economy of the Solomon Islands, 1880–1980, 43–60. Centre and periphery, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203985151.
Christian, B. (2020). The alignment problem: Machine learning and human values. WW Norton & Company.
Cortada, J. 2009. Rise of the knowledge worker. Routledge, Woburn, MA.
Couldry, N., and U.A. Mejias. 2019. The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dourish, P., J. Finlay, P. Sengers, and P. Wright. 2004. Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice. In CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 1727–1728.
Drucker, P.F. 1959. The landmarks of tomorrow. London: Heinemann.
———. 1994. The age of social transformation. The Atlantic Monthly 174 (5): 53–80.
European Commission. 2020. The next generation internet: A guide to the new concept and its opportunities. https://www.ideal-ist.eu/event/next-generation-internet-guide-new-concept-and-its-opportunities.
European Union. 2021. AI legislative package (AI act). https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/http://aipo.oecd.org/2021-data-policyInitiatives-27156.
Fanon, F. 1967. Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press.
Gandhi, L. 2006. Affective communities: Anticolonial thought, fin-de-si’ecle radicalism, and the politics of friendship. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.
Gardner, L. 2021. Before she disappeared. United Kingdom: Random House.
Gilbert, A. 1996. The virtual university? Gazette 1996 (Autumn): 5.
Glover, D., S. Law, and A. Youngman. 2002. Graduateness and employability: Student perceptions of the personal outcomes of university education. Research in post-compulsory education 7 (3): 293–306.
Goasduff, L. 2021. The 4 trends that prevail on the Gartner hype cycle for AI, 2021. Gartner.. https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/the-4-trends-that-prevail-on-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-ai-2021.
Gopal, P. 2019. Insurgent empire: Anticolonial resistance and British dissent. London: Verso Books.
Hao, K. 2020. A new way to train AI systems could keep them safer from hackers. MIT Technology Review, July 10: 2020. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/10/1005048/ai-deep-learning-safe-from-hackers-adversarial-attacks/.
Heintz, F. 2021. Trustworthy AI–integrating learning, optimization and reasoning: First international workshop, TAILOR 2020, virtual event, September 4–5, 2020, Revised Selected Papers. Springer Nature.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2019. Ethically Aligned Design, 1st Edition: IEEE Ethics in Action in Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
———. 2021. IEEE 7000–2021: Integrating ethical and functional requirements to mitigate risk and increase innovation in systems engineering design and development.. https://engagestandards.ieee.org/ieee-7000-2021-for-systems-design-ethical-concerns.html
Kharya, P., and A. Alvi. 2021. Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the world’s largest and most powerful generative language model. NVIDIA Developed.. https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/using-deepspeed-and-megatron-to-train-megatron-turing-nlg-530b-the-worlds-largest-and-most-powerful-generative-language-model/.
Kuleto, V., M. Ilić, M. Dumangiu, M. Ranković, O. Martins, D. Păun, and L. Mihoreanu. 2021. Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability 13 (18): 10424.
Kurzweil, R. 2005. The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin.
Law, J. 1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology 1: 1–134.
Littman, M.L., I. Ajunwa, G. Berger, C. Boutilier, M. Currie, F. Doshi-Velez, G. Hadfield, M.C. Horowitz, C. Isbell, H. Kitano, K. Levy, K. Lyons, M. Mitchell, J. Shah, S. Sloman, S. Vallor, and T. Walsh. 2021. Gathering strength, gathering storms: The one hundred year study on artificial intelligence (AI100) 2021 study panel report. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. September 2021. http://ai100.stanford.edu/2021-report.
Maldonado-Torres, N. 2007. On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 240–270.
Marshall, S.J. 2018. Making sense of change. In Shaping the University of the Future, 387–408). Journal of ICT Standardization. Singapore: Springer.
Mason, J.C. 2014. Theorizing why in digital learning: Opening frontiers for inquiry and innovation with technology. In Digital systems for open access to formal and informal learning: Research from CELDA 2012, ed. D.G. Sampson, 101–118. Cham: Springer.
Mason, J., B.E. Peoples, and J. Lee. 2020. Questioning the scope of AI standardization in learning. Education, and Training 8: 107–122.
Meisenzahl, M. 2019. Google made a small but important change in 2017 to how it thinks about ‘Googleyness,’ a key value it looks for in new hires. Business Insider Australia. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/google-googleyness-hiring-training-guide-change-2019-10.
Mignolo, W.D. 2007. Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 155–167.
———. 2012. Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mohamed, S., M.T. Png, and W. Isaac. 2020. Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology 33 (4): 659–684.
Moosavi, L. 2020. The decolonial bandwagon and the dangers of intellectual decolonisation. International Review of Sociology 30 (2): 332–354.
Nandy, A. 1989. Intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2015. Decoloniality as the future of Africa. History Compass 13 (10): 485–496.
Norman, A. 2017. Google’s new algorithm wants to help researchers stabilize nuclear fusion reactions. Futurism. https://futurism.com/googles-new-algorithm-wants-to-help-researchers-stabilize-nuclear-fusion-reactions.
OpenAI. 2021. Summarizing books with human feedback, September 23, 2021. https://openai.com/blog/summarizing-books/
Peoples, B.E. 2020. Reflections on interdisciplinary communications – Metaperspectives; exploring the affective domain. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 18 (1): 31–36.
Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin Americas. International Sociology 15 (2): 215–232.
Rajasingham, L. 2009. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) systems on future university paradigms. New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
Rheingold, H. 1993. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., A William Patrick Book.
Ricaurte, P. 2019. Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media 20 (4): 350–365.
Rosenberg, L., G. Willcox, M. Palosuo, and G. Mani. 2021. Forecasting of volatile assets using artificial swarm intelligence. In Proceedings, 4th international conference on artificial intelligence for industries (AI4I), 30–33. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AI4I51902.2021.00015.
Safieddine, F., R. Ismail, and A. Kulakli. 2017. E-universities: Reflective analysis into technological trends. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on e-society.
Said, E.W. 1993. Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage.
Sengers, P., J. McCarthy, and P. Dourish. 2006. Reflective HCI: Articulating an agenda for critical practice. In CHI’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 1683–1686.
Shakir, M., M.-T. Png, and W. Isaac. 2020. Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Vol. 33, 659. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8.
Shie, C.K., C.H. Chuang, C.N. Chou, M.H. Wu, and E.Y. Chang. 2015, August. Transfer representation learning for medical image analysis. In The 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), 711–714. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7318461.
Singularity Group. 2022. Our Mission. https://www.su.org/about.
Stribling, J., D. Aguayo, and M. Krohn. 2005. Rooter: A methodology for the typical unification of access points and redundancy. Journal of Irreproducible Results 49 (3): 5.
Stuart, M., and L. Shutt. 2019) A manifesto for the 21st century university. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/a-manifesto-for-the-21st-century-university/.
Vinge, V. 1993, March. Technological singularity. In VISION-21 symposium, 30–31, sponsored by NASA Lewis research center and the Ohio Aerospace Institute.
Walsh, T. 2010. Unlocking the gates: How and why leading universities are opening up access to their courses. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838578.
Wong, P.S., and P.A. Neck. 2010. A practitioner’s approach to Drucker’s knowledge-worker productivity in the 21st century: A new model. Revista de Management Comparat Internațional 11: 685–695.
Woolf, B. 1991. AI in education. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Department of Computer and Information Science.
Wulff, M. (2021, October 18). Interoperability: How to turn a blind spot into a strength. EDUCAUSE Review – Why IT Matters to Higher Education. https://er.educause.edu/articles/sponsored/2021/10/interoperability-how-to-turn-a-blind-spot-into-a-strength
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mason, J., Lefrere, P., Peoples, B., Lee, J., Shaw, P. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Evolution of the Virtual University. In: Sankey, M.D., Huijser, H., Fitzgerald, R. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University. University Development and Administration. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4170-4_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4170-4_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4168-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4170-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education