Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

On recognizing and formulating mathematical problems

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When mathematics is used to help people cope with real-life situations, a three-stage intellectual process is involved. First, a person becomes aware of a problem-situation which stimulates him to generate a problem-statement, a verbal story-problem. This may be in writing, expressed orally, or merely thought and evidenced by other behavior. Second, he transforms the verbal problem-statement into a mathematical formulation. Third, he analyzes this mathematically stated problem into subproblems to which the solution is more immediate.

We propose an operational instrument for assessing how a person moves from the first to the second and third stage. This involves coding questions asked, actions taken, hesitancy and latency. Results of using this procedure in experimental situations were used to determine reliability. We also propose and compare methods for effecting and accelerating motion from the first to the third stage. These involve operant conditioning, need arousal cues, controlled verbal instructions. Experience with one such technique to teach problem-formulation in actual teaching practice is reported.

The theoretical basis for these experiments is developed by showing how to program a computer to go through these stages for a reasonably large and interesting class of problem-situations to which mathematics is applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amarel S. (1971). “Representations and modeling of problems of program formulation,” in Machine Intelligence, (B. Meltzer and D. Michie, eds.), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badre, Albert N. (1973). “On hypotheses and representational shifting in ill-defined problem-situations,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Badre, Albert N. (1974). “The effects of hypothesis shifting on the solving of insight problems,” in Information Utilities, Proceedings of the 37th ASIS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, Vol. II, pp. 194–196.

  • Carroll J. B. and Freedle R. O. (eds.) (1972). Language Comprehension and the Acquisition of Knowledge, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman C. West (1972). The Design of Inquiring Systems, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichholz R. E. and D'Affer P. G. (1964); Elementary School Mathematics (Books 4 and 5), Palo Alto, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnham-Diggory S. (ed.) (1972). Information Processing in Children, New York: Academic Press, (esp. Chapters by Newell, p. 128, 132 and by Simon, p. 22, 76–78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. (1960a). Cognitive Mechanisms, New York: IBM, Yorktown Heights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. (1960b). “Experimental study of ‘hypothesis-formation’ by computer,” in Information Theory (C. Cherry, ed.), London: Butterworth Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. (1969); “Automatic question-answering of English-like questions about simple diagrams,” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 16: (January) 26–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. (1971). “Cognitive learning processes: an explication,” in Artificial Intelligence and Heuristic Programming (N. Findler and B. Meltzer, eds) Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 261–317; Revised version in German translation, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. and Badre A. N. (1974). “Questions and shifts of representation in problemsolving,” American Journal of Psychology 87, 3: 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. and Dreyfuss G. (1972). “An experiment in teaching college mathematics,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 3: 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M. and Uhr L. (1965). “A model for the process of learning to comprehend,” pp. 94–104 in Some Problems in Information Science, New York: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen M., MacKay D. M., Maron M. E., Scriven M., and Uhr L. (1964). “Computers and comprehension,” R A ND Report; also in The Growth of Knowledge (Kochen, ed.), Wiley, New York, 1965; see also “Adaptive mechanisms in digital ‘concept’ processing,” same book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler W. (1926). The Mentality of Apes, New York: Harcourt & Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. and Siklossy L. (eds.) (1972). Representation and Meaning, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E. and Donaldson W. (1972). Organization of Memory, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhr, L. and Kochen, M. (1969). “MIKROCOSMS and Robots,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially supported by an Office of Education Grant OEG5-72-0050(509).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kochen, M., Badre, A.N. & Badre, B. On recognizing and formulating mathematical problems. Instr Sci 5, 115–131 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052419

Keywords