Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

MLP neural network models of CMM measuring processes

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The objective of this study is to show how a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network can be used to model a CMM measuring process. To date, most MLP-based process models have been established for process mean only. An innovative approach is proposed to model simultaneously the mean and the variation of a CMM process using one integrated MLP architecture. Therefore, the MLP-based model obtained captures not only the process mean but also the process variation information. Selected issues related to neural network training are also discussed. Specifically, the guideline that was proposed by Mirchandani and Cao (1989) for selecting a number of hidden neurons is tested to determine the effects of the number of hidden neurons. The performances of two different learning algorithms - back-propagation with momentum factor (BPM) and the Fletcher-Reeves (FR) algorithm - are studied in terms of CPU time, training error, and generalization error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davis, W. (1992) Process variation analysis employing artificial neural network. IJCNN, II, 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. E. Jr and Schnabel, R. B. (1983) Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Non-linear Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. and White, H. (1989)Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2, 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T., Zhang, C., Lee, S. and Wang, H.-P. (1993) Implementation and comparison of three neural network learning algorithms. Kybernetes, 22(1), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, T. W. and Chen, L. J. (1994)A neural network approach for grinding processes: modeling and optimization. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 34(7), 917–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, R. P. (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Magazine, April, pp.4–22.

  • Luo, Y.-L., Kim, T.-S., Liao, T. W. and Tang, K. (in press) An investigation into the influences of operating parameters on CMM performances, Engineering Design and Automation.

  • McClelland, J. L. andRumelhart, D. E. (1988) Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, F. and Cao, W. (1989) On hidden nodes for neural nets. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 36(5), 661–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nix, D. A. and Weigend, A. S. (1994) Estimating the mean and variance of the target probability distribution, in Proceedings of 1994 IEEE ICNN, Orlando, June.

  • Phansalkar, V V and Sastry, P. S. (1994)Analysis of the backpropagation algorithm with momentum. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(3), 505–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, C. and Waeldele, F. (1986) Testing of Three Coordinate Measuring Machine Evaluation Algorithms, Commission of the European Communities, Physikalish-Technische Bundesanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangwala, S. S. and Dornfeld, D. A. (1989) Learning and optimization of machining operations using computing abilities of neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(2), 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reklaitis, G. V, Ravindran, A. and Ragsdell, K. M. (1983) Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hilton, G. E. and Williams, R. J. (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation, in Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations, Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L.(eds), Chapter 8, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, G. H. (1982) Taking the measure of CMMs. Special Report 749, American Machinist, 145–160.

  • Smith, A. E. (1993) Predicting product quality with backpropagation: a thermoplastic injection molding case study. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 8, 252–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannock, J. D. T., Lee, H., Cox, D. R., and Sims Williams, J. H. (1993) Intelligent inspection planning and computer aided inspection. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineeers, 207, 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, L. G. and Davies, B. J. (1992)Knowledge-based 21/2D prismatic component inspection planning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 7, 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelen, M. and Severo, N. C. (1964) Probability Functions. No. 26in Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (eds), National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series, 55, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warren Liao, T. MLP neural network models of CMM measuring processes. J Intell Manuf 7, 413–425 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122832

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122832

Keywords