Abstract
A simple method of diagnosing areas for course improvement in university science and engineering laboratory courses is described. A first year physics laboratory course is examined in terms of a set of aims. A questionnaire was used for staff and students to rate the importance of these aims in the cases (i) of each group's conception of what an ideal course in the subject should be, and (ii) each group's rating of the “traditional” and “non-traditional” components of the particular course under investigation. One means of identifying specific areas of improvement is out-lined. The potentialities of the technique are discussed.
References
Boud, D. J. and O'Connell, S. (1970). “Toward an educational technology of labora- tory work” Visual Education, December, pp. 11–13.
Chambers, R. G. (1963). “What use are practical physics classes?” Institute of Physics Bulletin 4, pp. 181–183.
Chambers, R. G. (1966). “The teaching of practical physics” in Brown, S. C. and Clarke, N. (eds) The Education of a Physicist. London; Oliver and Boyd, pp. 73–83.
Ferguson, G. A. (1966). Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 378.
Ivany, J. W. G. (1968). “Practical work in classrooms and laboratories” Teaching and Learning in the University, Bulletin No. 55 Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.
Kruglak, H. (1955). “Measurement of laboratory achievement. Part III. Paper-pencil analogs of laboratory performance tests” American Journal of Physics 23.
Labovitz, S. (1970). “The assignment of numbers to rank order categories” American Sociological Review 35.3, pp. 515–524.
Lee, L. S. (1970). “Research report: Projects or controlled assignments in the laboratory” Further Education, pp. 117–118.
Martin, D. G. (1969). “Ends and means in laboratory teaching” Bulletin of Mechanical Engineering Education 8.2, pp. 185–189.
Menzie, J. C. (1970). “The lost arts of experimental investigation” American Journal of Physics 38.9, pp. 1121–1127.
Scriven, M. (1967). “The methodology of evaluation” in Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation American Educational Research Association Monograph on Curriculum Evaluation No. 1, Chicago: Rand McNally.
Sturley, K. R. (1967). “Is laboratory work really necessary?” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education5, pp. 63–66.
Wall, C. N., Kruglak, H. and Trainor, L. E. H. (1951). “Laboratory performance tests at the University of Minnesota” American Journal of Physics 19, pp. 546–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Aims are used in this context as descriptions of general declarations of intent as distinct from objectives which specify more detailed information about a course.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boud, D.J. The laboratory aims questionnaire—A new method for course improvement?. High Educ 2, 81–94 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162539
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162539