Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Similarity indices, sample size and diversity

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of sample size and species diversity on a variety of similarity indices is explored. Real values of a similarity index must be evaluated relative to the expected maximum value of that index, which is the value obtained for samples randomly drawn from the same universe, with the diversity and sample sizes of the real samples. It is shown that these expected maxima differ from the theoretical maxima, the values obtained for two identical samples, and that the relationship between expected and theoretical maxima depends on sample size and on species diversity in all cases, without exception. In all cases but one (the Morisita index) the expected maxima depend strongly to fairly strongly on sample size and diversity. For some of the more useful indices empirical equations are given to calculate the expected maximum value of the indices to which the observed values can be related at any combination of sample sizes. It is recommended that the Morisita index be used whenever possible to avoid the complex dealings with effects of sample size and diversity; however, when previous logarithmic transformation of the data is required, which often may be the case, the Morisita-Horn or the Renkonen indices are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baroni-Urbani C, Buser MW (1976) Similarity of binary data. Syst Zool 25:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities in southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheetham AH, Hazel JE (1969) Binary (presence-absence) similarity coefficients. J Palaeont 43:1130–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford HT, Stephenson W (1975) An introduction to numerical classification. Academic Press, New York-San Francisco-London

    Google Scholar 

  • Czekanowski J (1913) Zarys Metod Statystycnck. Warsaw: E. Wendego. See also: Coefficient of racial likeness and durchschnittliche Differenz. Anthropol Anz 9:227–249 (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology 26:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol 12:42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghent AW (1963) Kendall's “Tau” coefficient as an index of similarity in comparisons of plant and animal communities. Canad Entomol 95:568–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghent AW (1972) A graphic computation procedure for Kendall's Tau suited to extensive species-density comparisons. Am Midl Nat 87:459–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1980) Spatial variation in the timing of the seasonal occurrence in coprophagous beetles. Oikos 34:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H (1966) Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. Am Nat 100:419–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhta V (1979) Evaluation of different similarity indices as measures of succession in arthropod communities of the forest after clear-cutting. Oecologia (Berl) 41:11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance GN, Williams WT (1967) Mixed-data classificatory programs. I. Agglomerative systems. Aust Comput J 1:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountford MD (1962) An index of similarity and its application to classificatory problems. In: PW Murphy (ed), Progress in Soil Zoology. Butterworths, London, pp. 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita M (1959) Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu Univ, Ser E. Bio., 3:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkonen O (1938) Statistisch-ökologische Untersuchungen über die terrestische Käferwelt der finnischen Bruchmoore. An Zool Soc Zool-Bot Fenn Vanamo 6:1–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen TA (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content, and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. K dan Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr 5:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CB (1949) Jaccard's generic coefficient and coefficient of floral community, in relation to the logarithmic series and the index of diversity. Ann Bot 13:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1978) Fluctuations in abundance of tropical insects. Am Nat 112:1017–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1981) Seasonality of leafhoppers (Homoptera) on Barro Colorado Island. In: EG Leigh, AS Rand, DM Windsor (eds), Ecology of a tropical forest: Seasonal rhythms and longterm changes. Smithsonian Press, Washington (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H, Fisk FW (1981) Seasonality of tropical insects II. Blattaria (cockroaches) from the seasonal tropics of Panama. J Anim Ecol (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolda, H. Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50, 296–302 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344966

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344966

Keywords