Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Quantitative evaluation of product disassembly for recycling

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a method for evaluating the ease-of-disassembly of products. Its primary use is in designing products for recycling, but it also facilitates consideration of servicing and maintenance, and making environmentally-related decisions. The method is developed and discussed in the context of relatively small products that can be disassembled by a seated person using hand-held tools. The evaluation procedure is centered around a spreadsheet-like chart and uses a catalog of task difficulty scores. The scores were derived from work-measurement analyses of standard disassembly tasks, and provide a means of identifying weaknesses in the design and comparing alternatives quantitatively. The structure of the evaluation chart and the derivation of difficulty scores are explained, followed by a demonstration of analyzing a computer central processing unit. The limitations of the method and future extensions are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakerjian R. (ed.) Environmentally responsible product design. Design for Manufacturability 6 (Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook Series, 4th ed.). SME, Dearborn, MI, 1992; 10.61–10.64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beitz W. Designing for ease of recycling. Journal of Engineering Design 1993; 4(1): 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boks CB, Brouwers WCJ, Kroll E, Stevels ALN. Disassembly modeling: Two applications to a Philips 21” television set. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Electronics and the Environment, Dallas, TX, 1996; 224–229

  4. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P. Product Design for Assembly. Boothroyd Dewhurst, Wakefield, RI, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burke DS, Beiter K, Ishii K. Life-cycle design for recyclability. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Design Theory and Methodology, Miami, FL, 1992; 325–332

  6. Cole R. Fast fabrication for foam chassis. Machine Design 1995; 67(5): 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Constance J. Can durable goods be designed for disposability? Mechanical Engineering 1992; 114: 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dewhurst P. Product design for manufacture: Design for disassembly. Industrial Engineering 1993; 25: 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanft TA. Quantitative assessment of disassembly difficulty in product recycling. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, 1995

  10. Kirby JR, Wadehra I. Designing business machines for disassembly and recycling. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Electronics and the Environment, Arlington, VA, 1993: 32–36

  11. Kroll E, Beardsley B, Parulian A. A methodology to evaluate ease of disassembly for product recycling. IEE Transactions 1996; 28: 837–845

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kroll E. Application of work-measurement analysis to product disassembly for recycling. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application (CERA) 1996; 4(2): 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kroll E. Development of a disassembly evaluation tool. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Design Theory and Methodology, Irvine, CA, 1996

  14. McGlothlin S, Kroll E. Systematic estimation of disassembly difficulties: Application to computer monitors. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Electronics and the Environment, Orlando, FL, 1995: 83–88

  15. Navin-Chandra D. ReStar: A design tool for environmental recovery analysis. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Engineering Design, The Hague, Netherlands, 1993; 2: 780–787

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon M. Objective assessment of designs for recycling. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Engineering Design, The Hague, Netherlands, 1993; 2: 832–835

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zandin KB. MOST Work Measurement Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zussman E, Kriwet A, Seliger G. Disassembly-oriented assessment methodology to support design for recycling. Annals of the CIRP 1994; 43(1): 9–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehud Kroll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kroll, E., Hanft, T.A. Quantitative evaluation of product disassembly for recycling. Research in Engineering Design 10, 1–14 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580266

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580266

Keywords