Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Convergence properties of trust region methods for linear and convex constraints

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a convergence theory for convex and linearly constrained trust region methods which only requires that the step between iterates produce a sufficient reduction in the trust region subproblem. Global convergence is established for general convex constraints while the local analysis is for linearly constrained problems. The main local result establishes that if the sequence converges to a nondegenerate stationary point then the active constraints at the solution are identified in a finite number of iterations. As a consequence of the identification properties, we develop rate of convergence results by assuming that the step is a truncated Newton method. Our development is mainly geometrical; this approach allows the development of a convergence theory without any linear independence assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D.P. Bertsekas, “Projected Newton methods for optimization problems with simple constraints,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 20 (1982) 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Burke, “An exact penalization viewpoint of constrained optimization,” Argonne National Laboratory, Mathematics and Computer Science Division Report ANL/MCS-TM-95 (Argonne, IL, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Burke and J.J. Moré, “On the identification of active constraints,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 25 (1988) 1197–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Calamai and J.J. Moré, “Projected gradient methods for linearly constrained problems,”Mathematical Programming 39 (1987) 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Conn, N.I.M. Gould and Ph.L. Toint, “Global convergence of a class of trust region algorithms for optimization problems with simple bounds,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 25 (1988a) 433–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Conn, N.I.M. Gould and Ph.L. Toint, “Testing a class of methods for solving minimization problems with simple bounds on the variables,”Mathematics of Computation 50 (1988b) 399–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Dunn, “On the convergence of projected gradient processes to singular critical points,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 55 (1987) 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fletcher, “An algorithm for solving linearly constrained optimization problems,”Mathematical Programming 2 (1972) 133–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fletcher,Practical Methods of Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1987, 2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.M. Gafni and D.P. Bertsekas, “Two-metric projection methods for constrained optimization,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 22 (1984) 936–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Gay, “A trust region approach to linearly constrained optimization,” in: D.F. Griffiths, ed.,Numerical Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1066 (Springer, Berlin, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.P. McCormick and R.A. Tapia, “The gradient projection method under mild differentiability conditions,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 10 (1972) 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Moré, “Recent developments in algorithms and software for trust region methods,” in: A. Bachem, M. Grötschel and B. Korte, eds.,Mathematical Programming Bonn 1982—The State of the Art (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Moré, “Trust regions and projected gradients,” in: M. Iri and K. Yajima, eds.,Systems Modelling and Optimization: Proceedings of the 13th IFIP Conference on System Modelling and Optimization, Tokyo, Japan, August 31-September 4, 1987, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 113 (Springer, Berlin, 1988) pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Moré and D.C. Sorensen, “Computing a trust region step,”SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 4 (1983) 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J.D. Powell, “On the global convergence of trust region algorithms for unconstrained minimization,”Mathematical Programming 29 (1984) 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Robinson, “Generalized equations and their solutions, part II: Applications to nonlinear programing,”Mathematical Programming Study 19 (1982) 200–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A. Schultz, R.S. Schnabel and R.H. Byrd, “A family of trust region based algorithms for unconstrained minimization with strong global convergence properties,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Anlysis 22 (1985) 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ph.L. Toint, “Global convergence of a class of trust region methods for nonconvex minimization in Hilbert space,”IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 8 (1988) 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.H. Zarantonello, “Projections on convex sets in Hilbert space and spectral theory,” in: E.H. Zarantonello, ed.,Contributions to Nonlinear Functional Analysis (Academic Press, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported in part by the Applied Mathematical Sciences subprogram of the Office of Energy Research of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant DMS-8803206 and by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant AFSOR-860080.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burke, J.V., Moré, J.J. & Toraldo, G. Convergence properties of trust region methods for linear and convex constraints. Mathematical Programming 47, 305–336 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580867

Key words