Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Approximate motion planning and the complexity of the boundary of the union of simple geometric figures

  • Published:
Algorithmica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study rigid motions of a rectangle amidst polygonal obstacles. The best known algorithms for this problem have a running time of Ω(n 2), wheren is the number of obstacle corners. We introduce thetightness of a motion-planning problem as a measure of the difficulty of a planning problem in an intuitive sense and describe an algorithm with a running time ofO((a/b · 1/ɛcrit + 1)n(logn)2), whereab are the lengths of the sides of a rectangle and ɛcrit is the tightness of the problem. We show further that the complexity (= number of vertices) of the boundary ofn bow ties (see Figure 1) isO(n). Similar results for the union of other simple geometric figures such as triangles and wedges are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. P. Chew and K. Kedem, High-Clearance Motion Planning for a Convex Polygon among Polygonal Obstacles, Technical Report No. 184/90, Tel Aviv University (1990).

  2. H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, and J. Stolfi, Optimal Point Location in a Monotone Subdivision,SIAM J. Comput. 15 (1986), 317–340.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Guibas, M. Sharir, and S. Sifrony, On the General Motion Planning Problem with Two Degrees of Freedom,Discrete Comput. Geom. 4 (1988), 491–521.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Kedem, R. Livne, J. Pach, and M. Sharir, On the Union of Jordan Regions and Collision-free Motion Amidst Polygonal Obstacles,Discrete Comput. Geom. 1 (1986), 59–71.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kedem and M. Sharir, An Efficient Algorithm for Planning Collision-free Translational Motion of a Convex Polygonal Object in 2-dimensional Space Amidst Polygonal Obstacles,Proc. First ACM Symp. on Computational Geometry, 1985, pp. 75–80.

  6. K. Kedem and M. Sharir, An Efficient Motion-Planning Algorithm for a Convex Polygonal Object in Two-Dimensional Polygonal Space,Discrete Comput. Geom. 5 (1990), 43–75.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Leven and M. Sharir, Planning a Purely Translational Motion for a Convex Object in Two-Dimensional Space Using Generalized Voronoi Diagrams,Discrete Comput. Geom. 2 (1987), 9–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Livne and M. Sharir, On Intersection of Planar Jordan Curves, Technical Report No. 153, Robotics Report No. 37, Courant Institute, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Lozano-Perez and M. Wesley, An Algorithm for Planning Collision-free Paths Among Polyhedral Obstacles,Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 22 (1979), 560–570.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sharir, Davenport-Schinzel Sequences and Their Geometric Applications,Theoretical Foundations of Computer Graphics and CAD (edited by R. A. Earnshaw), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988, pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Mikhail J. Atallah.

This work was supported partially by the DFG Schwerpunkt Datenstrukturen und Algorithmen, Grants Me 620/6 and Al 253/1, and by the ESPRIT II Basic Research Actions Program of the EC under Contract No. 3075 (project ALCOM).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alt, H., Fleischer, R., Kaufmann, M. et al. Approximate motion planning and the complexity of the boundary of the union of simple geometric figures. Algorithmica 8, 391–406 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01758853

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01758853

Key words