Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Can you make a computer understand and produce art?

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although artificial intelligence techniques have been successfully applied to reproduce many rational features of human behaviour, a great barrier has been encountered in simulating human activities where intuition and emotion are involved. Art making and viewing are processes where typically rational and mechanical aspects interact with aesthetic and cognitive criteria. Can you make a computer understand and autonomously produce art?

The main purpose of this paper is to present the most relevant approaches in the study of art perception and creation via computer, focusing on the results achieved in artistic computer graphics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Anderson, J. (1984). Cognitive Psychology.Artificial Intelligence.23 (1) 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, M. (1977). Can Computer Be Programmed to Appreciate Art?Leonardo. 10 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badler, N. (1989). Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language, and Simulation for Human Animation. In Magnenat-Thalmann, N. and Thalmann, D. (eds)State of the Art in Computer Animation Springer-Verlag, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A. (1983). Artificial Intelligence: Cognition as Computation. In Machlup, F. and Mansfield, U. (eds)The Study Of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages. Wiley Interscience.

  • Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. (1979). What Is An Image?Proc. IJCAI.6. 1028–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. (1985). Can Computers Make Art? Tools, Rules, and Other Issues of Art-making Significance.Nicograph '85 International Symposium.

  • Cohen, H. (1987). Implementing an Expert Artmaking System.Proc. 1st International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems. Berlin, West Germany.

  • Cohen, H. (1988). How to Draw Three People in a Botanical Garden.AAAI '88. Saint Paul, Minnesota.

  • Davison, N. (1982). Designing a Recursive Framework for Evolutive Poetry.Proc. of the 2nd Symposium of Small Computers in the Arts. Philadelphia, PA.

  • Dietrich, F. (1986). Visual Intelligence: The First Decade of Computer Art (1965–1975).Leonardo.19 (2) 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, H. (1965).Computer Graphics — Computer Art. Springer-Verlag.

  • Gips, J. and Stiny, G. (1975). An investigation of Algorithmic Aesthetic.Leonardo.8, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. (1980).Goedel, Escher, Bach: An External Golden Braid. Vintage Books.

  • Hofstadter, D. (1985).Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern. Bantam Books.

  • Jankel, A. and Morton, R. (1984).Creative Computer Graphics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kahn, K. (1979). Making Aesthetic Choices.Proc. IJCAI 1979. 448–450.

  • Kirsh, J. and Kirsh, R. (1985). Computer Viewing Artists at Work.Proc. of the 5th Symposium of Small Computers in the Arts. Philadelphia, PA. 65–67.

  • Kirsh, J. and Kirsh, R. (1986). The Structure of Paintings: Formal Grammar and Design.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.13. 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory, R. (1969). Computer Sculpture: Six Levels of Cybernetics.Artforum. 29–35.

  • Mazlack, L. and Granger, M. (1981). Representing Aesthetic Judgments.Proc. of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society. Atlanta, GA.

  • Noll, M. (1966). Human or Machine: A Subjective Comparison of Piet Mondrian's “Composition with Lines” (1917) and a Computer-Generated Picture.The Psychological Record.16, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palyka, D. (1985). Computer/Art: Depolarization and Unification.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 47–56.

  • Roads, C. (1985). Research in Music and Artificial Intelligence.Computing Surveys.17 (2) 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, C. (1982). Computers and Choreography.Proc. of the 2nd Symposium on Small Computers in the Arts. Philadelphia, PA.

  • Stiny, G. (1980). Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars.Environment and Planning B.7. 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1950). Computer Machinery and Intelligence.Mind.59 (236) 433–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. (1984). Computers and Poetry.Proc. of the 4th Symposium on Small Computers in the Arts. Philadelphia, PA.

  • Zeltzer, D. (1986). Knowledge-Based Animation. In Badler, N. I. and Tsotsos, J. K. (eds)Motion: Representation and Perception. Elsevier Science. 318–323.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Roberto Maiocchi

Authors
  1. Roberto Maiocchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maiocchi, R. Can you make a computer understand and produce art?. AI & Soc 5, 183–201 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891915

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891915

Keywords

Search

Navigation