Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cocitation analysis for thirty-six journals and other publications in neural networks research and related disciplines was conducted over three consecutive time periods spanning the years 1990-early 1997. Cluster analysis and MDS maps identified groupings representing foundation research areas (physics/optics, computer engineering, neuroscience, expert systems & cognition, and perception) along with neural networks and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Principal components analysis demonstrated a similar structure, with several journals and books loading on a majority of the factors. An INDSCAL analysis showed an increasing separation between natural sciences/psychology and engineering/neural networks research from the first time period to the third.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. Van Raan, A. F. J.;Tijssen, R. J. W. 1993. The neural net of neural networks research: An exercise in bibliometric mapping,Scientometrics, 26: 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rappa, M. A.;Debakere, K. 1989. The Emergence of a New Technology: The Case of Neural Networks. WP#3031-89-BPS., Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rappa, M. A.;Debakere, K. 1990. International Survey of the Neural Network Research Community: Preliminary Report. WP#3170-90-BPS., Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowan, J. D. 1990. Neural networks: The early days. In:Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2.,D. S. Touretzky (Ed.), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kauffman. p. 828–842.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hecht-Nielsen, R. 1990.Neurocomputing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. See especially p. 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson, P. K., 1990.Artificial Neural Systems: Foundations, Paradigms, Applications, and Implementations, New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allman, W. F. 1989.Apprentices of Wonder, New York, NY: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coveney, P.;Highfield, R. 1995.The Frontiers of Complexity, New York, NY: Fawcett Columbine.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, J. A.;Rosenfeld, E. 1988.Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, J. A.;Pellionisz, A.;Rosenfeld, E. 1990.Neurocomputing 2: Directions for Research Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCain, K. W.;Whitney, J. P. 1994. Contrasting assessments of interdisciplinarity in emerging specialties: The case of neural netowrks research,Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 15(3): 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tijssen, R. J. W. 1993. A scientometric cognitive study of neural network research: Expert mental maps versus bibliometric maps,Scientometrics, 28:111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Den Besselaar, P.;Leydesdorff, L. 1996. Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(6): 415–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. The fifth,International Journal of Neural Networks, has ceased publication.

  15. Kohonen, T. 1989.Self-Organization and Associative Memory, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rumelhart, D. E.;McClelland, J. L. (Eds), 1986.Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, 2v, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hebb, D. O. 1949.The Organization of Behavior, New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCain, K. W. 1991. Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4): 290–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCain, K. W. 1990. Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. One is reminded of the three “point-of-interest” models in the VIBE system that visualizes the distribution of documents as they relate to two or more specific topics. Both interactive and static literature visualization techniques, including bibliometric mapping, are discussed inWhite, H. D.;McCain, K. W. 1997. Visualization of literatures,Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 32: 3–72; the VIBE system is explained clearly inOlsen, K. A.; Korfhage, R. R.; Sochats, K. M.; Spring, M. B.; Williams, J. G. 1993. Visualization of a document collection: The VIBE system,Information Processing & Management, 29(1): 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rikken, F.;Kiers, H. A. L.;Vos, R. 1995. Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug-reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL,Scientometrics, 33: 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. White, H. D.; McCain, K. W. 1997. Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972–1995,Journal of the American Society for Information Science (in press).

  23. Coxon, A. P. M. 1982.The User's Guide to Multidimensional Scaling, Exeter, NH: Heinemann Educational Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCain, K. W. 1998. The Research Front Cluster History of Neural Networks Research, 1984–1991. in preparation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Science & Technology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, (USA)

    Katherine W. McCain

Authors
  1. Katherine W. McCain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCain, K.W. Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics 41, 389–410 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459053

Keywords

Search

Navigation