Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Leaching of CuFeS2 by aqueous FeCl3, HCl, and NaCl: Effects of solution composition and limited oxidant

  • Hydrometallurgy
  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Batch leaching experiments were performed in which the initial amounts of chalcopyrite and ferric chloride were selected to ensure that the oxidant was significantly depleted over the course of an experiment. Solution samples were analyzed for Cu(II) and Fe(III) by visible spectrophotometry and for total copper and total iron by atomic absorption, making it possible to measure changes in the solution component concentrations as leaching progressed. For selected samples, the solution potential was also measured. In all experiments, the Cu(II) concentration passed through a maximum and, simultaneously, the Cu(I) concentration increased very sharply. An acceleration in the total rate of leaching was normally observed at the same time. Early in a leach, the solution potential was too high for the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) to take place at the time of the increase in the overall leaching rate, however, the solution potential dropped sharply during a span of a few hours, reaching a value low enough that reduction of cupric ion became possible. The amount of Cu(I) present at the completion of a leach was dependent on the total chloride concentration of the system. The highest Cu(I)/Cu ratios were observed in systems with the highest chloride concentrations. The ultimate extent of CuFeS2 leaching was dependent on the initial FeCl3 and total chloride concentrations; the FeCl3 was virtually completely consumed and the total chloride concentration controlled the extent to which Cu(II) was reduced by reaction with chalcopyrite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. J. D. Sullivan:Trans. AIME, 1933, vol. 106, pp. 515–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Ermilov, O. B. Tkachenko, and A. L. Tseft:Tr. Inst. Met., Obogashch, 1969, vol. 30, pp. 3–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. F. P. Haver and M. M. Wong: R. I. 7474, U. S. Bureau of Mines, 1974

  4. F. P. Haver and M. M. Wong:J. Metals, 1971, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 25–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. L. Jones and E. Peters:Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, J. C. Yannopoulos and J. D. Agarwal, eds., AIME, New York, NY, 1976. pp. 633–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. E. Dutrizac:Metall. Trans. B, 1978, vol. 9B, pp. 431–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Peters, G. M. Swinkels, and A. Vizsolyi:Process and Fundamental Considerations of Selected Hydrometallurgical Systems M. C. Kuhn, ed. Soc. of Mining Engineers, New York, NY, 1981. pp. 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. R. Palmer, C. O. Nebo, M. F. Rau, and M. C. Fuerstenau:Metall. Trans. B, 1981, vol. 12B, pp. 595–601.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Dutrizac:Metall. Trans. B, 1981, vol. 12B, pp. 371–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Dutrizac:Metall. Trans. B, 1982, vol. 13B, pp. 303–09.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ammou-Chokroum, M. Cambazoglu, and D. Steinmetz:Bull. Mineral., 1977, vol. 100, pp. 161–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Ammou-Chokroum, M. Cambazoglu, and D. Steinmetz:Bull. Mineral., 1977, vol. 100, pp. 149–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Hirato, M., Kinoshita, Y. Awakura, and H. Majima:Metall. Trans. B, 1986, vol. 17B, pp. 19–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. P. Wilson and W. W. Fisher:J. Metals, 1981, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Bonan, J. M. Demarthe, H. Renon, and F. Baratin:Metall. Trans. B, 1981, vol. 12B, pp. 269–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. W. McDonald and S. H. Langer:Metall. Trans. B, 1983, vol. 14B, pp. 559–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. W. McDonald, T. J. Udovic, J. A. Dumesic, and S. H. Langer:Hydrometallurgy, 1984, vol. 13, pp. 125–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. T. Kimura, P. A. Haunschild, and K. C. Liddell:Metall. Trans. B, 1984, vol. 15B, pp. 213–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nomenclature of Inorganic chemistry, 2nd ed., Butterworths, London, 1971, pp. 1–20.

  20. M. L. O'Malley and K. C. Liddell:Metall. Trans. B, 1985, vol. 16B pp. 403–04.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. W. Ramette and G. Fan:Inorg. Chem., 1983, vol. 22, pp. 3323–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. G. Kelly, and D. J. Spottiswood:Introduction to Mineral Processing, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1982, pp. 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. L. O’Malley and K. C. Liddell:Hydrometallurgical Reactor Design and Kinetics, R. G. Bautista, R. J. Wesely, and G. W. Warren, eds., The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1986, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Malley, M.L., Liddell, K.C. Leaching of CuFeS2 by aqueous FeCl3, HCl, and NaCl: Effects of solution composition and limited oxidant. Metall Trans B 18, 505–510 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654262

Keywords