Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A simulative approach to determining the economic efficiency of software patents

  • WI - Aufsatz
  • Published:
Wirtschaftsinformatik

Abstract

Traditionally, only technical inventions such as light bulbs or pharmaceuticals were protected by patents. Nowadays software patents are a widely discussed topic in the U.S. and in Europe because of their supposed impact on national innovation rates. Based on an analysis of the determinants of successful software development, we use a bipartite probability model to compare a deregulated market without patents to a market using a patent system. Applying computer-based simulations, we analyze different scenarios to test the impact of different patent duration and width on the innovation behavior of the software market. We show that strong patent protection is globally efficient only in markets with a relatively low profit potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckmann, Jürgen: Merkblatt Auslandspatente, 2002, http://www.be-patent.de/MBpatwo.pdf (as of 2003-02-10).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Besen, Stanley M.; Farrell, Joseph: Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1994) 2, pp. 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Besen, Stanley M.; Raskind Leo J.: An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1991) 1, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bessen, James; Maskin Eric: Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation. MIT Working Paper, Cambridge 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blind, Knut; Edler, Jakob; Nack, Ralph; Straus, Josef: Mikro- und makroökonomische Implikationen der Patentierbarkeit von Softwareinnovationen: Geistige Eigentumsrechte in der Informationstechnologie im Spannungsfeld von Wettbewerb und Innovation. Research Report, BmWT (36/00) 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burk, Dan L.: Copyrightable functions and patentable speech. In: Communications of the ACM 44 (2001) 2, pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ceci, Stephen J.; Kain Edward L.: Jumping on the bandwagon: The impact of attitude polls on polling behavior. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 46 (1982), pp. 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, Howard F.: Patent scope, antitrust policy and cumulative innovation. In: RAND Journal of Economics 26 (1995) 1, pp. 34–57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dasgupta, Partha; Stiglitz Joseph E.: Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity. In: The Economic Journal 90 (1980) 358, pp. 266–293.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Economides, Nicholas: The Economics of Networks. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization 14 (1996), pp. 669–671.

    Google Scholar 

  11. EITO (European Information Technology Observatory), Frankfurt/Main, 2002.

  12. Enos, John L.: Petroleum Progress and Profits: a History of Process Innovation. In: MIT Press, Cambridge 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farrell, Joseph; Saloner, Garth: Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. In: RAND Journal of Economics 16 (1985), pp. 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedewald, Michael; Blind, Knut; Edler, Jakob: Die Innovationstätigkeit der deutschen Softwareindustrie. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 44 (2002) 2, pp. 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gort, Michael; Klepper, Steven: Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. In: The Economic Journal 92 (1992) 367, pp. 630–653.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green, Jerry R.; Scotchmer, Suzanne: On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation. In: RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1995) 1, pp. 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griliches, Zvi: The Search for R&D Spillovers. In: Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (1992) supplement, pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harhoff, Dietmar; Reitzig, Markus: Strategien zur Gewinnmaximierung bei der Anmeldung von Patenten. Working Paper, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoppen, Norman; Beimborn, Daniel; König, Wolfgang: The Impact of Software Patents on the Structure of the Software Market — A Simulation Model. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS03), Naples 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoppen, Norman; Beimborn, Daniel; König, Wolfgang: Patente auf Software — Gibt es die optimale Schutzweite?. In: Uhr, Wolfgang; Esswein, Werner; Schoop, Eric (Hrsg.): Medien, Märkte, Mobilität — Tagungsband der Wirtschaftsinformatik 2003. Leipzig 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jaffe, Adam B.: The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7280, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Katz, Michael L.; Shapiro, Carl: Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. In: Journal of Political Economy 94 (1986) 4, pp. 822–841.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kortum, Samuel; Lerner Josh: Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is behind the Recent Surge in Patenting. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 6204, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liebowitz, Stan J.; Margolis, Stephen E.: Winners, Losers & Microsoft. Competition and Antitrust in High Technology. Oakland 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Loury, Glenn C.: Market Structure and Innovation. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 93 (1979) 3, pp. 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mykytyn, Kathleen; Mykytyn, Peter P.; Bordoloi, Bijoy; McKinney, Vicki; Bandyopadhyay, Kakoli: The Role of Software Patents in Sustaining IT-enabled Competitive Advantage: A Call for Research. In: Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (2002) 1, pp. 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. N.: Proposal for a directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions. Commission of the European Community, Brussels 2000. http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/indprop/comp/02-32.htm (as of 2003-11-30).

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. N.: Analyse und Evaluation der Softwareentwicklung in Deutschland, GfK Marktforschung GmbH and Fraunhofer-Institut 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. N.: Pharmadaten 2001. Bundesverband der pharmazeutischen Industrie (BdPI). http://www.bpi.de/internet/download/geschaefts_bericht.pdf, 2001 (as of 2003-01-22).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. N.: Annual Report 2001. European Patent Office, 2002. http://www.european-patentoffice.org/epo/an_rep/2001/index.htm (as of 2003-07-16).

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. N.: Annual Report of the German Patent and Trademark Office 2002. http://www.dpma.de/veroeffentlichungen/jahresbericht02/jb 2002.pdf, as of 2003-08-08.

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. N.: Performance and Accountability Report for fiscal Year 2002. United States Patent and Trademark Office 2003. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2002/index.html, as of 2003-08-02.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. N.: Class 705 Application Filing and Patents issued Data. United States Patent and Trademark Office 2003. http://www.uspto.gov/web/menu/pbmethod/applicationfiling.htm (as of at 2003-08-02).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ordover, Janusz A.: A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1991) 1, pp. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scherer, Frederick M.; Ross, David: Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shapiro, Carl; Varian, Hal R.: Information rules: A strategic guide to network economy. Boston 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Spence, Michael: Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. In: Econometrica 52 (1984) 1, pp. 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Mertonstraße 17, 60054, Frankfurt, Deutschland

    Daniel Beimborn &  Norman Hoppen

Authors
  1. Daniel Beimborn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norman Hoppen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beimborn, D., Hoppen, N. A simulative approach to determining the economic efficiency of software patents. Wirtschaftsinf 46, 50–60 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03250995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03250995

Keywords

Search

Navigation