Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Towards Automated Case Knowledge Discovery in the M 2 Case-Based Reasoning System

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present the M 2 Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) system. The M 2 system addresses a number of issues that present methodologies for CBR systems have shied away from. We discuss techniques for removing the knowledge acquisition bottleneck when acquiring case knowledge. Here, case knowledge refers to the complementary knowledge structures, cases (more specific in nature) and adaptation rules (more general). We address the use of negative cases for updating the case knowledge as well as for refining the similarity measures. In particular we discuss in detail, showing experimental results, the use of Data Mining within the M 2 system to build the case base from a database containing operational data, and discover adaptation rules. A methodology to monitor the competence of the CBR system and to utilize negative cases for updating the CBR system to enhance its competence is also discussed. The M 2 CBR system also employs Rough Set and Fuzzy Set theories to further enhance its capabilities within real-world applications as well as providing a richer and truer model of human reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. A. Aamodt. A Knowledge-Intensive Approach to Problem Solving and Sustained Learning, PhD dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1991.

  2. R. Agrawal, R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: Proc. 20th International Conference on VLDB, Chile, 1994, pp.487-499.

  3. S. S. Anand, D. Patterson, J. G. Hughes. Knowledge intensive exception spaces. In: Proc. AAAI-98 Conference, 1998, pp.574-579.

  4. S. S. Anand, B. W. Scotney, M. G. Tan, S. I. McClean, D. A. Bell, J. G. Hughes, I. C. Magill. Designing a kernel for data mining, IEEE Expert, April, 65-74, 1997.

  5. K. D. Ashley, E. L. Rissland. A case-based approach to modelling legal expertise, IEEE Expert 3(3), 70–77, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CLEMENTINE User Guide, Integral Solutions Ltd, Basingstoke, England, 1996.

  7. J. G. Carbonell. Learning by analogy: Formulating and generalising from past experiences. In: R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, T. M. Mitchell (eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, 1983, pp.83-134.

  8. O. Curet, J. Elliott, M. Jackson. Designing knowledge discovery based systems in business, finance and accounting with a case-based approach: Two case studies. In: IEE Colloquium on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.

  9. W. Dubitzky, J. G. Hughes, D. A. Bell. A generic, object-oriented case-knowledge representation scheme, and its integration into a wider information management scenario, Expert Systems: The International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks 13(3), 219–233, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Dubitzky, J. G. Hughes, D. A. Bell. Case memory and the behaviouristic model of concepts. In: Proc. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, 3rd European Workshop, EWCBR-96, Switzerland, 1996, pp.120-134.

  11. W. Dubitzky, A. Schuster, J. G. Hughes, D. A. Bell, K. Adamson. How similar is VERY YOUNG to 43 years of age? On the representation and comparison of polymorphic properties. In: 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Japan, 1997, pp.226-231.

  12. U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, R. Uthurusamy (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI/ MIT Press, 1996.

  13. F. Gebhardt. Discovering interesting statements from a database, Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 10, 1–14, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Hanney, M. T. Keane. Learning adaptation rules from a case-base. In: Proc. of European Workshop on Case Based Reasoning, 1996, pp.179-192.

  15. R. S. Michalski. A theory and methodology of inductive learning. In: R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach 1983, pp.83-134.

  16. Z. Pawlak, J. Grzymala-Busse, R. Slowinski, W. Ziarko. Rough sets, Communications of the ACM 38, 89–95, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Schuster, W. Dubitzky, D. A. Bell, J. G. Hughes, K. Adamson. Aggregating features and matching cases on vague linguistic expressions. In: 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Japan, 1997, pp.252-257.

  18. E. E. Smith, D. L. Medin. Categories and Concepts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Smyth, M. T. Keane. Remembering to forget: A competence-preserving case deletion policy for case-based reasoning systems. In: Proc. IJCAI-95, 1995, pp.337-382.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Patterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patterson, D., Anand, S.S., Dubitzky, W. et al. Towards Automated Case Knowledge Discovery in the M 2 Case-Based Reasoning System. Knowledge and Information Systems 1, 61–82 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325091

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325091

Keywords